Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt
From the Courts »
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-I Vs. Smt. Ritu Singal
 Vinod Kumar Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-17
 How you can gift and still save tax on top of HRA, tuition fee, more Income Tax Returns (ITR) filing top hack

Income Tax Ofifcer, Waziron Ka Baagh, Srinagar (Garhwal), Uttrakhand. Vs Sunder Lal Semwal, Upper Bazar, Joshimath, Distt. Chamoli, Garhwal, Uttrakhand.
December, 08th 2015
I.T.A. No. 6378/Del/2013
Assessment Year: 2009-10

                        DELHI BENCH `D' NEW DELHI


                           ITA NO.6378/DEL/2013
                           ASSTT. YEAR: 2009-10

Income Tax Ofifcer,             vs   Sunder Lal Semwal,
Waziron Ka Baagh,                    Upper Bazar, Joshimath,
Srinagar (Garhwal),                  Distt. Chamoli, Garhwal,
Uttrakhand.                          Uttrakhand.
                                     (PAN: AOVPS9919R)
(Appellant)                          (Respondent)

                  Appellant by: Shri Ashis Mohanty, Sr. DR
                 Respondent by: Shri Gautam Jain, Adv.

                           O R D E R


      This appeal of the revenue for assessment year 2009-10 has been

preferred by the revenue against the order of CIT(A)-I, Dehradun dated

27.09.2013. The only dispute in this appeal is against deletion of addition of

Rs. 9,56,465/-, the tax effect on which is admittedly below Rs. 3 lakhs.

2.    The learned counsel for the assessee, at the outset, contends that as

per Central Board of Direct Taxes, Instruction No.3/2011 dated 09th

February, 2011, the revised limit for preferring revenue's appeals has been

I.T.A. No. 6378/Del/2013
Assessment Year: 2009-10

increased from Rs.2 lacs to Rs. 3 lacs, although the tax effect in the present

revenue's appeal is below the prescribed limit of Rs. 3 lacs. In view

thereof, the revenue's appeal may be dismissed as the tax effect being below

the prescribed limit.

3.    The learned Departmental Representative agrees to the tax calculation

and the upward revision of tax effect appealable under revenue's appeal to

Rs. 3 lacs.

4.    We have heard both sides. The CBDT, vide above instruction has

clearly laid down that the revenue should not prefer appeals against

assessees before ITAT if the tax effect involved in the appeal, excluding

interest, is less than Rs. 3 lacs. The tax payable in the present appeal being

below Rs. 3 lacs, the revenue's appeal is dismissed as not maintainable in

view of CBDT Instruction.

5.    In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

      Order pronounced in the open court on 7.12.2015.

      Sd/-                                                Sd/-

  ( J.S. REDDY )                                  ( C.M. GARG )
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                               JUDICIAL MEMBER

DT. 7th DECEMBER, 2015

I.T.A. No. 6378/Del/2013
Assessment Year: 2009-10

Copy forwarded to:

    1.   Appellant
    2.   Respondent
    3.   CIT(A)
    4.   CIT 5. DR
                                  By Order

                               Asstt. Registrar

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System development CMS development Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions Content Management Services CMS Services CMS Software

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions