Girish O Bang, L-59/60, Yogi Prestige 403/404, Yogi Nagar,Borivali (W), Mumbai-400092 Vs. Income Tax Officer 25(2)(4), C-11, Pratyaksha Kar Bhavan, lst floor, Bandra Kurla Complex,Bandra, Mumbai-400051 |
, ""
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "G" BENCH, MUMBAI
.., ,
BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND
SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
./I.T.A. No.3031 and 3032/Mum/2012
( / Assessment Year :2007-08 and 2008-09)
Girish O Bang, / Income Tax Officer 25(2)(4),
L-59/60, Yogi Prestige Vs. C-11, Pratyaksha Kar Bhavan,
403/404, Yogi Nagar, lst floor, Bandra Kurla Complex,
Borivali (W), Bandra,
Mumbai-400092 Mumbai-400051
./ PAN : AEKPB1072M
( /Appellant) .. ( / Respondent)
/ Appellant by : None
/ Respondent by : Smt.Anu K Aggarwal
/ Date of Hearing :3.12.2015
/Date of Pronouncement : 3.12.2015
ORDER
PER B.R.BASKARAN,AM:
Both the appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the
orders passed by the ld.CIT(A)-35, Mumbai and they relate to the
assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09.
2. Assessee is aggrieved by the decision of ld.CIT(A) in partially
confirming the addition of deposits found in the bank account of the
assessee in both the years.
3. None appeared on behalf of the assessee even though the notice
was sent to the assessee by RPAD on more than one occasion. Hence, we
proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte, without the presence of the
assessee.
2
I T A N o . 3 0 3 1 a n d 3 0 3 2 / / Mu m / 2 0 1 2
4. We heard the ld. DR and perused the record. We notice that the
assessee could not properly explain the sources of deposits made in his
bank account and hence, the AO assessed the entire amount of deposits
made in the bank account aggregating to Rs.65.14 lakhs and Rs.29.35
lakhs respectively for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09
respectively.
5. In the appellate proceedings, the ld. CIT(A) followed peak credit
theory, accordingly sustained the addition to the extent of Rs.10.54 lakhs
and Rs.12.35 lakhs for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09
respectively. Still aggrieved, the assessee has filed these appeals before
us.
6. A perusal of the orders passed by the ld. CIT(A) show that the First
Appellate Authority has taken a conscious decision after considering the
entire gamut of facts surrounding the issue. Further we notice that the ld.
CIT(A) has followed the decision rendered by the Tribunal in assessee's
own case in ITA No.4314/Mum/2008 relating to assessment year 2005-06,
wherein the Tribunal had held that additions should be restricted to peak
cash credit. Under these set of facts, we do not find any infirmity in the
order of ld.CIT(A) and accordingly upheld the same for both the years.
7. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 3rd Dec 2015.
Sd sd
( /SANDEEP GOSAIN) (../ B.R.BASKARAN)
/Judicial Member /Accountant Member
Mumbai; Dated.. 3rd Dec,2015
3
I T A N o . 3 0 3 1 a n d 3 0 3 2 / / Mu m / 2 0 1 2
.../ SRL, Sr. PS
/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. / The Appellant
2. / The Respondent.
3. () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4. / CIT concerned
5. , , /
DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6. / Guard file.
/ BY ORDER,
True copy
(Asstt. Registrar)
, /ITAT, Mumbai
|