sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 Contata Solutions Pvt.Ltd. A-16/9, Vasant Vihar New Delhi 110 057 vs. ITO, Ward 6(3), Room No.376A Central Revenue Building I.P.Estate New Delhi 110 002
 Late Sh. D. K. Jain Through Legal Hier Mrs. Usha Jain D-19, Nizamuddin East New Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-32(1) New Delhi.
 Shri Neeraj Puri 74-C, Rajpur Road Dehradun Vs. The Pr. C.I.T Dehradun
 Ashok Kumar S/o Sh. Hari Kishan Hingo Kheri, Kandela D- Shamli vs. ITO, Ward – 1 (4) Shamli
 Satish Kumar, Rra Taxindia, D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi – 49 Vs. Ito, Ward 2(3), Faridabad
 Income-tax Officer, Ward 6(1), New Delhi vs. Magic Software Pvt. Ltd., 9th Floor, Tower C, Tech Bouleward, Plot No. 6, Sector 127, Noida.
 Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Sony Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
 Sh. Lokesh Garg Prop. M/s. Garg Yarn Traders, Railway Road, Pulkhuwa, Distt. Hapur vs. ITO Ward – 3 (4) Hapur
 ITO, Ward – 1(5) Noida vs. Sh. Jagpal Singh S/o Sh. Rishal Singh, Village Jaganpur Afzalpur, Post : Dankaur, Distt : Gautam Budh Nagar
 80 LPA-Opening CFO- Real Estate Developer

Vaishnav S Puri (HUF) Prop. M/s of Kaks International NCL Bldg, 8th floor, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400051 Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax 19(3), Piramal Chambers, 3rd Floor, Lalbaug, Parel, Mumbai-400012
December, 15th 2014
                      ,                                     ""  
        IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "F" BENCH, MUMBAI

         BEFORE HON'BLE S/SHRI D. MANMOHAN , VICE-PRESIDENT
                      AND B.R.BASKARAN (AM)
          , .  ,                            .. ,   
                  Miscellaneous Application No.396/Mum/2014
           (Arising out of   ./I.T.A. No.3259/Mum/2013)
                    (   / Assessment Year:2009-10)


 Vaishnav S Puri (HUF)                /         Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax
 Prop. M/s of Kaks International      Vs.       19(3),
 NCL Bldg, 8th floor,                           Piramal Chambers,
 Bandra Kurla Complex,                          3rd Floor, Lalbaug,
 Bandra (E),                                    Parel,
 Mumbai-400051.                                 Mumbai-400012
         ( /Appellant)                ..        (     / Respondent)

          . /   . /PAN/GIR No. : AACHP9479A

             / Appellant by                :   Ms.Asifa Khan
               /Respondent by :                Shri Vivek Batra


               / Date of Hearing
                                                     : 12.12.2014
              /Date of Pronouncement : 12.12.2014

                                   / O R D E R


Per B.R.BASKARAN, Accountant Member:

        The assessee has filed this application seeking the recall of the ex-parte
order    dated   20.8.2014   passed    in      the     hands    of   the   assessee   in
ITANo.3259/Mum/2013 relating to assessment year 2009-10.

2.      The ld. counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the present
appeal was fixed for hearing for the first time on 31.7.2014 and on that date she
appeared before the bench and took the adjournment. Accordingly, the case
was adjourned to 18.8.2014. However on that date of hearing, her mother fell
sick and hence she could not appear before the Bench for hearing. The ld. AR
submitted that non-appearance on the date of hearing was for the reasons
                                          2                       MA No.396/Mum/2014








beyond the control of the authorized representative and not due to the
negligence on the part of the assessee. The ld. counsel further submitted that
Tribunal had decided an identical issue against the assessee for the assessment
year 2006-07 and the matter is pending before the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High
Court of Bombay. Hence, the assessee is intending to file a declaration u/s
158A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for the year under consideration in
order to avoid multiplicity of the appeals. She submitted that the assessee would
be put to great loss, if the present miscellaneous application is not considered
favourably.    Accordingly, the AR submitted that there was a reasonable cause
for the assessee for not appearing before the Bench on the date of hearing.
Accordingly, she prayed for recall of the order.


3.     We have heard the ld. DR and perused the record. Having regard to the
submissions made by the ld. AR, we are of the view that there was a reasonable
cause for the assessee for not appearing before the bench on the date of
hearing. Accordingly, in exercise of the powers given to the Bench under Rule
24 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, we recall the order dated 20.8.2014 referred
supra. We also direct the registry to post this appeal for final hearing on
19.01.2015.        Since the date of hearing is announced in the open court in the
presence of both the parties, they may note that the registry shall not sent any
formal notice of hearing to them, i.e. present order shall also be considered as
notice of hearing.







4.     In the result, the misc. application filed by the assessee is allowed.


       The above order was pronounced in the open court on 12th Dec, 2014.

                                      12th Dec, 2014    


              sd                                     sd

(.  /D. MANMOHAN)                             (..  ,/ B.R. BASKARAN)
          /VICE- PRESIDENT                   /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
  Mumbai: 12 Dec,2014.
            th



. ../ SRL , Sr. PS
                            3                 MA No.396/Mum/2014




        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.  / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,                   /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.


                                              / BY ORDER,
           true copy
                                        (Asstt. Registrar)
                              ,  /ITAT, Mumbai

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Privacy Policy

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions