Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Service Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income tax return filing for FY23-24: Check details of Form 16 issue date, ITR forms
 How to maximize tax benefits for senior citizens in India
 Income tax return filing: ITR filing 2024 date is upon us, but should you rush to file?
 Income Tax Return AY 2024-25: ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 Enabled for Online Filing; Check Details
 New Tax Regime: What Is It? How Can You Opt For It? Comparison With Old One
 6 Ways to Save Income Tax On New & Old Tax Regime for FY 2023-24
 Income Tax SFT return filing due date extension: Facility to remain open for a couple of days Latest news
 Income tax filing: Waiting for your Form 16? Here is what you need to know
 Salaried? Rental tax calculation rules you should know before ITR filing in 2023
 What are new tax regime's slabs? Know its limits, benefits, and more
 How much additional tax do you need to pay? ITR filing last date for FY 2019-20

Court warns Service Tax dept against filing 'frivolous' pleas
December, 02nd 2014

A Delhi court has warned Service Tax department against filing "frivolous" and "vexatious" petitions against individuals and wasting the precious time of court and money of common people.

Additional Sessions Judge Lokesh Kumar Sharma pulled up the department while rejecting its revision petition filed against the order of the magisterial court and said "heavy penalties shall be imposed" in future if it repeats its act.

In its order the magisterial court had allowed Surender Pal Singh Chadha to deposit Rs seven lakh surety amount against its previous order of Rs eight lakh for failing to produce an accused in service tax matter for whom he had stood surety to secure his bail.

The department had appealed against the magisterial court order reducing the surety amount.

"I would like to observe my anguish and serious concern over the petitioner's (Department of Service Tax) over anxious behaviour in moving frequently to higher courts on trivial and frivolous issues.

"The petitioner had eventually forgotten that it is not a functionary of the state rather it is the state itself and by filing such frivolous and vexations petitions, the precious time of the court and money of the common people of the nation had been wasted," the judge said.

In its order, however, sessions court refrained itself from imposing a cost on Department of Service Tax while warning it not to indulge in similar acts.

"Though on this action of the petitioner, I am refraining myself from imposing costs upon the petitioner. However, the petitioner is warned to refrain itself from involving in such litigations with the individuals in future failing which heavy penalties shall be imposed upon it," the court said.

"I do not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate," it said, noting that magistrate has powers to remit portion of penalty under the bond even after passing the final order and before recovery of total amount.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting