Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: form 3cd
From the Courts »
 ITO vs. NVS Builders Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
 Approva Systems Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Pune)
 Procter & Gamble Home Products Pvt. Ltd vs. ITAT (Bombay High Court)
 Virag Tiwari Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 & Others
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)

Atulkumar Amritlal Sanghavi (HUF),1607 B, Sankar ShethPalace, Tardeo Road,Grant Road,Mumbai 400 007 Vs. The ITO 16(2)(2), Mumbai
December, 04th 2014
          ,  Û "",  

                    ^ .. , Û   ¢
                   Before Shri I P Bansal, Judicial Member

                  ./ITA No.5214/Mum/2014
               ( [ [ / Assessment Year:2004-05)

    Atulkumar Amritlal Sanghavi         Vs.    The ITO 16(2)(2),
    (HUF),                                     Mumbai
    1607 ­B, Sankar Sheth
    Palace, Tardeo Road,
    Grant Road,
    Mumbai ­ 400 007
    PAN AAAHS4876A
        ( /Appellant)                             (× / Respondent)

            Appellant by         :      Ms. Vinita Shah
            Respondent by        :      Mr. Neil Philip

     Date of Hearing : 27.11.2014             Date of Pronouncement :27.11.2014

                                  / O R D E R

      This appeal is filed by the assessee. It is directed against the order passed by
the CIT(A) ­ 27, dated 05.05.2014, for A.Y. 2004-05. The grounds of appeal read
as under:

      "1.    On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as in Law,
      the Learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the Learned
      Assessing Officer in reopening the case, without considering the
      provision of law.

      2.    On the fact and circumstances of the case as well as in Law, the
      Learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the Learned
      Assessing Officer in making an addition of Rs.2,20,140/- as alleged
      Undisclosed Income on account of sale consideration of sale of 4600
      share of M/s. Talent Infoways Ltd., without considering the facts &
      circumstances of the case."
                                                                   ITA No.5214/Mum/2014

2.      At the time of hearing, the learned AR did not press ground No.1. Therefore,
the same is dismissed being not pressed.

3.      As per information received by the AO from DDI (Investigation), the assessee
was beneficiary of alleged bogus bills of transactions from M/s. Goldstar Finvest Pvt.
Ltd. Accordingly, the case was reopened and sale value of the shares of M/s. Talent
Infoways Ltd. amounting to Rs.2,20,2140/- was added to the income of the
assessee. The disallowance has been upheld by the learned CIT(A). It may be
mentioned here that it has been the case of the assessee that sale of shares did not
take place in the relevant financial year as the sale took place on 20.05.2004.
Therefore, the transaction of sale of shares cannot be considered as income in the
present year. Neither the purchase was done during the year nor has the sale been
affected during the year. It is also a matter of fact that the same amount has been
added by the Department in AY 2005-06 as it can been seen from the assessment
order dated 23.01.2013 for A.Y. 2005-06. Copy of the said order is placed at pages
32 to 36 of the paper-book. Thus, it is the case of the assessee that the learned
CIT(A) has wrongly upheld the addition. The date of sale of shares is supported by
documentary evidence, copy of which are also filed at pages 24 to 26 of the paper-

4.      On the above facts, I have heard both the parties.        Since, neither the
purchase nor the sale has been made by the assessee during the year under
consideration, the addition in the year under consideration cannot be sustained.
Accordingly, the same is deleted and ground no.2 is allowed.

5.      In the result, the appeal is partly allowed.

        Order pronounced in the open court on this 27th day of November, 2014.

                                                                 (I P Bansal)
                                                               JUDICIAL MEMBER

MUMBAI, Dt : 27th November, 2014
                                                           ITA No.5214/Mum/2014

Copy forwarded to :
   1. The Appellant
   2. The Respondent
   3. The C.I.T, concerned
   4. The CIT (A)-concerned
   5. The DR, "SMC" Bench, Mumbai
                                                BY ORDER

           //True Copy//

                                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                        ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - We Bring IT. Offshore software outsourcing company. We use Global Delivery Model (GDM) and believe in Follow The Sun principle

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions