Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt
 
 
From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

Shamlaji Pradesh Kelavani Mandal At & PO: Shamlaji Dist: Sabarkantha Vs ADIT (E), S.K.Circle, Himmatnagar
December, 31st 2013
          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                   AHMEDABAD "B" BENCH

            Before: Sri D.K Tyagi, Judicial Member
           and Shri T.R. Meena, Accountant Member

                     ITA No. 2091/Ahd/2012
                    Assessment Year 2008-09


     Shamlaji Pradesh Kelavani          ADIT (E),
     Mandal At & PO:                    S.K.Circle,
     Shamlaji Dist:            Vs       Himmatnagar
     Sabarkantha                        (Respondent)
     PAN: AAETS 3542 B
     (Appellant)



        Revenue by:           Sri P.L. Kureel, Sr.D.R.
        Assessee by:          Sri Gourav Mehta, A.R.


      Date of hearing                   :   19-12-2013
      Date of pronouncement             :   23-12-2013



                            /ORDER

PER : D.K. TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-

     This is the assessee's appeal against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-XXI
Ahmedabad dated 16-07-2012.
I.T.A No.2091/Ahd/2012    A.Y. 2008-09                                              Page No           2
Shamlaji Pradesh Kelavani Mandal vs. ADIT(E)



2.    The assessee is aggrieved by the action of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming
the penalty of Rs. 53,000/- levied by AO u/s. 272A(2)(e).


3.    AO while levying this penalty has observed as under:-

             "Assessee is a charitable trust As per provisions of section
      139(4A) of the I.T. Act as applicable in assessee's case, assessee was
      supposed to file his return of income along with audit report on or
      before 30-09-2008. On verification of records it was noticed that
      return of income for A. Y 2008-09 was filed by assessee on 05-03-
      2010
From the above facts, it is noticed that the return of income was filed by the assessee late by 521 days. ............................................................................................. ............................................................................................ ............................................................................................. Assessee's reply has been carefully considered but not found acceptable on the grounds mentioned below. Assessee simply stated that delay in filing of return is not intentionally therefore liberal view may be taken and drop the penalty proceedings. Assessee has not given any reasonable cause and failed to prove that there was reasonable cause for failure and also failed to justify the reasons for each default committed for late filing of the return. Submissions of return by charitable trust is essential even if its income is exempt as held in the case of Lala Gopimal Kuthiala Trust vs. ITO 1962 436 ITR (Punj). If the total income of the charitable trust (without claiming u/s. 11,12, and 13A) exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to tax then submissions of return by the trust essential." 4. In appeal this action of AO was confirmed by Ld. CIT(A). I.T.A No.2091/Ahd/2012 A.Y. 2008-09 Page No 3 Shamlaji Pradesh Kelavani Mandal vs. ADIT(E) 5. Before us it was argued on behalf of the assessee that return could not be filed in time in this case as due to illness of the secretary of the trust finalization of accounts and audit could not be completed in due time. Audit report u/s. 12AB r.w.s. 17B in Form No. 10B was finalized only on 13-02- 2010 and immediately return was filed on 15-03-2010. He therefore prayed that since assessee was prevented by sufficient cause in not being able to file the return in time penalty should not have been levied in this case and therefore penalty so levied and sustained by Ld. CIT(A) may kindly be deleted. Ld. DR on the other hand vehemently supported the order passed by lower authorities. 6. After hearing both the parties and perusing the record, we find that there is no dispute about the fact that return in this case was filed late and therefore penalty proceedings u/s. 272A(2)(e) were initiated and penalty of Rs. 53,000/-was imposed. This penalty was confirmed by Ld. CIT(A). Before us submission of the assessee was that return was filed late as the accounts of the trust could be finalized and audit report was prepared by the auditors only on 13-03-2010 due to illness of the secretary of the trust Mr. Maheshbhai Patel who was suffering since 2001 and was also operated with by-pass surgery. In support of this submission documents relating to the illness and treatment of Mr. Patel were also filed. Taking this into consideration we are of the view that assessee was prevented by reasonable cause in not being able to file his income tax return in time and therefore it was not a fit case to impose penalty u/s. 272A(2)(e) and therefore penalty so levied by AO and sustained by Ld. CIT(A) is hereby deleted. I.T.A No.2091/Ahd/2012 A.Y. 2008-09 Page No 4 Shamlaji Pradesh Kelavani Mandal vs. ADIT(E) 7. In the result, assessee's appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in open court on the date mentioned hereinabove at caption page Sd/- Sd/- (T.R. MEENA) ( D.K. TYAGI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad : Dated 23/12/2013 ak / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/ , / ,
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System developers CMS developers Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions CMS India Content Management System India CMS development India Website CMS Website Content Management India Portal CMS India CMS Outsourcing CMS Vendor Complete CMS Custom CMS Services

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions