Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: empanelment :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
 
 
From the Courts »
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. M/s N.C Cables Ltd.
 BDR BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. Vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
 Sports Infratech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Hqrs)
 Delhi High Court interprets applicability of amendments to Arbitration Act
  M/s Skin Institute And Public Services Charitable Trust Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption)
 M/s Skin Institute And Public Services Charitable Trust Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption)
 ITO vs. Emami Paper Mills Ltd (ITAT Kolkata)
 Surya Prakash Toshniwal HUF vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
 CIT vs. Subhash Vinayak Supnekar (Bombay High Court)
 Apollo Tyres Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Cochin)
 CIT vs. SSA’s Emerald Meadows (Supreme Court)

Regarding administrative circular for Assessing officers and First Appellate Authorities to decide all objections to refund claims in one go.
December, 18th 2013

F. No. 267/78/2013-CX.8

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Board of Excise and Customs

*******

 

New Delhi, the 11th December, 2013

 

INSTRUCTION

To

  1. All Chief Commissioners and Directors General under the Central Board of Excise and Customs.
  2. CDR, Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
    1. All Commissioners of Customs/Central Excise/Service Tax/ All Joint Chief Departmental Representatives/ Commissioners, Directorate of Legal Affairs.
  3. All Commissioners of Central Excise (Appeals)/Commissioners of Customs (Appeals).
  4. webmaster.cbec@icegate.gov.in

 

 

Madam/ Sir,                                                                

Subject:  Judgement of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of M/s Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs Union of India and others in Central Excise Appeal (L) No. 22 of 2013. – reg.

 

            Attention is invited to the judgement of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of M/s Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs Union of India and others in Central Excise Appeal (L) No. 22 of 2013 wherein the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has observed as under:

                        “Before concluding, it is necessary for this court to observe that while adjudicating upon refund claims, it is necessary in the interest of justice for the assessing officers as well as the first appellate authorities to dispose of all the objections. Otherwise, where  the assessing officer or as the case may be the first appellate authority deals with only one or more of the objections without dealing with the claim in its entirety, proceedings remain pending for several years thereafter before the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. This results in orders of remand in consequence of the failure of the assessing officer or the first appellate authority, as the case may be, to deal with all the aspects of the matter. This prolongs litigation, with several rounds of appeal and remand, which is best avoided both in the interest of the assessee and the revenue. Certainty promotes the rule of law.

                        Hence, we are of the view and direct that the CBEC should issue necessary guidelines in the form of an administrative circular to ensure that assessing officers and first appellate authorities decide all objections to refund claims.”

2.         The above directions of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court are brought to notice of all concerned for compliance.

 

Yours faithfully,

(Vikas Kumar)

Director (CX-8)   

 

 

Site is maintained under supervision of Directorate General of Systems and Data Management, Delhi

<< Back

Home >>


This site is best viewed with internet explorer 5.0 and above with  1024 x 768  pixels resolution

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System development CMS development Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions Content Management Services CMS Services CMS Software

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions