Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt
 
 
From the Courts »
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 Vs. Dr. Vandana Gupta
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Prasidh Leasing Ltd.
  CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Danisco India Private Ltd vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
  Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 M/S Abhipra Capital Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Investigation)
 Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)

Mr. Pankaj Dua, 426, Sector-5, Gurgaon. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 36(1), New Delhi.
December, 15th 2012
         IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
               DELHI BENCH `F': NEW DELHI

      BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
           SHRI B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                           I.T.A. No.5183/Del/2011
                            Assessment Year : 2005-06

Mr. Pankaj Dua,                        Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax,
426, Sector-5, Gurgaon.      Vs.       Circle 36(1), New Delhi.
                                       PAN : AKPPD9635F

     (Appellant)                             (Respondent)

                   Appellant by : None.
                   Respondent by : Shri Rajesh Kumar Kadia, Sr. DR.

                            Date of hearing      : 13-12-2012
                            Date of Pronouncement : 13-12-2012

                                   ORDER

PER JOGINDER SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

        The assessee is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 23-08-2011

passed by the learned First Appellate Authority, New Delhi on the grounds

as mentioned in the grounds of appeal.

2.      At the time of hearing no one was present on behalf of the assessee

nor any request for adjournment was moved. The record shows that on the

last date of hearing i.e. on 16th July, 2012 the case was adjourned to 13th

December, 2012 on the request of the counsel for the assessee and the next
                                       2                  ITA No.5183/Del/2011





date was duly noted by the learned counsel as is evident from record. Today

i.e. 13th December, 2012, at the time of hearing the assessee neither

presented himself nor moved any adjournment petition. It seems that the

assessee is not interested to pursue his appeal. Shri Rajesh Kumar Kadia, Sr.

DR appeared for the Revenue.

3.     Considering the facts and keeping in view the provisions of Order V

Rule 19A of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, as were considered in

the cases of CIT vs. Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del); and Late

Tukoji Rao Holkar, 223 ITR 480 (MP), we dismiss this appeal filed by the

assessee for non-prosecution. The assessee, if so advised, shall be free to

move this Tribunal praying for recalling of this order and explaining the

reasons for non-appearance etc. and if the Bench is so satisfied about the

reasons, then this order may be recalled.




4.     Finally, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution.

5.     This order was pronounced in the Open Court in the presence of the

learned Sr. DR at the conclusion of the hearing on 13th December, 2012.


              Sd/-                                 Sd/-
       ( B.C. MEENA)                          (JOGINDER SINGH)
     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                        JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 13th December, 2012.
                                   3                ITA No.5183/Del/2011


Copy of the order forwarded to:-

  1.   Appellant
  2.   Respondent
  3.   CIT
  4.   CIT(A)
  5.   DR                               By Order


*mg                                Deputy Registrar, ITAT.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions