Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: empanelment :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
 
 
From the Courts »
  Rites Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-V
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. I.T.C. Limited
  John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  CIT vs. The Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron and Steel Market Committee (Bombay High Court)
 Canyon Financial Services Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer
 Chintels India Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax – Circle 8
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. International Tractors Ltd.
 Hcl Technologies Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-2 & Anr.
 New Delhi Television Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. The Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron and Steel Market Committee (Bombay High Court)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Fair Invest Ltd, ITA 232 of 2012, Dated November 22, 2012
December, 11th 2012

(as in Delhi High Court)

In the case of CIT vs. Fair Finvest Ltd., ITA No. 232/2012 decided by the Delhi High Court on 22nd November, 2012 it has been held that where the assessee adduced evidences in support of the share application money the AO is supposed to examine the same and reject these evidences on tenable ground. Further in case he wishes to rely on the report of the investigation authorities, some meaningful enquiry ought to be conducted by him to establish a link between the assessee and the alleged hawala operators.
In the absence of these, the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd. 216 CTR (SC) 195 will be applicable and the case of the Nova Promoters & Finlease (P) Ltd. will not be applicable despite the fact of the case being identical to the extent that entries have been received from the same companies of Mr. Mahesh Garg as was in the case of Nova Promoters. Accordingly in all those cases where the AO has not conducted an enquiry independently during the assessment proceedings, the judgment of the Supreme Court in Lovely Exports will be applicable and judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Nova Promoters & Finlease (P) Ltd. will not be applicable.Read more

 

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions