Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

ACIT, Circle 1,Meerut. Vs. Anand Duplex Ltd., 85, Saket, Meerut.
December, 06th 2012
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     (DELHI BENCH `A' : NEW DELHI)
              BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
               SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                              ITA No.5096/Del /20112
                              Assessment Year : 2009-10

ACIT, Circle 1,                      Vs.             Anand Duplex Ltd.,
Meerut.                                              85, Saket,
                                                     Meerut.
                                                     (PAN/GIR No.AABCA4927A)

(Appellant)                                          (Respondent)

                      Assessee by : Shri K. Sampath, Adv.
                      Revenue by : Mrs. Anuradha Misra, CIT(DR)







                                     ORDER
PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M.


       This appeal of the department is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-

Meerut, dated 03.07.2012, relevant to assessment year 2009-10, whereby besides

challenging the action of the CIT(A) being in violation of Rule 46A of the I.T. Rules,

department has also challenged the deletion of addition of Rs.2,29,49,502/- as unproved

sundry creditors ignoring the fact that the assessee failed to confirm them and another

deletion of addition of Rs.1,27,27,605/- being inflated purchases out of total purchases of

Rs.12,72,76,048/- ignoring the fact that letters of enquiry in 12 cases sent to the parties

by the Assessing Officer remained un-complied with and purchases to the magnitude of

Rs.8,34,01,381 remained unproved out of which Assessing Officer disallowed merely

Rs.1,27,27,605/- treating only 10% of the total purchases as inflated and thus added only

a bare minimum amount out of unconfirmed sums of Rs.8.34 crores by taking support

from various case laws.
                                              2                    I.T.A. No.5096/Del./2012
                                                                            (A.Y. : 2009-10)
2.     At the very outset, Ld.DR submitted that assessee failed to get confirmed the

amounts as mentioned in the grounds of appeal before the Assessing Officer despite

having been given number of opportunities whereas CIT(A) has accepted such additional

evidence having been filed before him without waiting for the remand report sought for

which was yet to be replied by the Assessing Officer and after considering such

additional evidence deleted the impugned additions made by the Assessing Officer. So,

order of CIT(A) is not only violative of Rule 46A of the Rules, but also not in conformity

with law inasmuch as additions have been deleted without verification having been made

by CIT(A) at his level. It was thus pleaded to set aside the order of the CIT(A) and

restore the matter on his file for re-consideration of the appeal afresh.

4.     Ld.Counsel for the assessee has very fairly submitted that provisions of Rule 46A

of the Rules appears to have not been complied with by the CIT(A) as pointed out by the

Ld.DR. Therefore, in the interest of justice and to have fair play in the matter, appeal can

be restored back to the CIT(A) for re-consideration and appropriate action.

5.     We have heard both the sides, considered the material on record as well as case

laws cited by the department in the ground filed with memorandum of appeal and find

that certain additional evidence has not only been admitted by the CIT(A), but

considering the same, the impugned additions have also been deleted, when reply to

remand report had not yet come. Therefore, in view of the facts and circumstances and

material on record, we hold that order of CIT(A) is not only violative of Rule 46A of the

Rules, but also in contravention of relevant provisions of law. As such while accepting

the appeal of the department, we set aside the impugned order and restore the matter back

on the file of the CIT(A) for re-consideration of the appeal after giving due opportunity to
                                             3                   I.T.A. No.5096/Del./2012
                                                                          (A.Y. : 2009-10)
the assessee as well as to the Assessing Officer by passing a speaking order while

complying with the provisions of Rule 46A and other relevant provisions of the law. We

hold and direct accordingly.






6.     As a result, the appeal of the Revenue gets accepted for statistical purposes.
       Order pronounced in open court on 03.12.2012.

               Sd/-                                                     Sd/-
       (SHAMIM YAHYA)                                                 (U.B.S. BEDI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                            JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated : Dec. 03, 2012.
SKB
Copy of the order forwarded to:-
   1. Appellant
   2. Respondent
   3. CIT
   4. CIT(A), Meerut.
   5. CIT(ITAT)                                              Deputy Registrar, ITAT
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting