Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TDS :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
 
 
« ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period Of 27-02-2017 To 02-03-2017 & 06-03-2017 To 10-03-2017
 Income Appellate Tribunal Bangalore Benches Bangalore "A" Bench DB Cases Causelist for the week from 27/02/2017 To 02/03/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches , Ahmedabad S/shri R.P. Tolani, JM & Amarjit Singh, AM Causelist For Bench 'A' Date : 27/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Lucknow Benches , Lucknow Constitution From : 27/02/2017 To 03/03/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches , Ahmedabad S/shri R.P. Tolani, JM & Amarjit Singh, AM Causelist For Bench 'A' Date : 27/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches Chennai Constitution For The Week From 20/02/2017 To 23/02/2017 (24102/2017 Declared As Closed Holidav)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bangalore Benches , Bangalore Causelist for the Week from : 13/02/2017 To 16/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches , Ahmedabad S/shri N.K. Billaiya, Am & Mahavir Prasad, JM Causelist For Bench 'B' Date : 13/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Benches, Jaipur Constitution For The Period Of 13.02.2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period Of 13.02.2017 To 16.02.2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata. Constitution of Kolkata Benches For One Week From 13.02.2017 To 16.02.2017.(17th February 2017- M.A.Day)

Chattisgarh State Electricity Board vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
December, 23rd 2011

S. 194-I TDS: To be Rent, payee must have control over asset
 
The assessee, a SEB, entered into an agreement with NTPC for purchase of power and another with Power Grid Corporation for transmission of the power from NTPCs bus bars to the delivery point. The AO & CIT (A) took the view that the transmission charges paid by the assessee to Power Grid was rent for use of plant and tax ought to have been deducted u/s 194-I. The argument that as the payee had been assessed, no recovery could be made from the payer was also rejected. The assessee was held liable for failure to deduct TDS. On appeal by the assessee, HELD allowing the appeal:
 
(i) S. 194-I defines rent to include any payment, by whatever name called, under any lease, agreement or arrangement for the use of any machinery or plant. For a payment to be construed as rent, it is a condition precedent that the payer should have some control over the asset. There is a distinction between the use of an asset and the benefit derived from an asset. In a transaction of hire/ leasing, the possession of the goods and its effective control is given to the customer and the customer has the freedom and choice of how to use the asset. On the other hand, if the customer entrusts to the assessee the work of achieving a certain desired result and that involves the use of goods belonging to the owner, the control of the asset remains with the owner and there is no use by the customer (Asia Satellite 332 ITR 340 (Del) followed, Japan Airlines 325 ITR 298 (Del) & Krishna Oberoi 257 ITR 105 (AP) distinguished;
 
(ii) On facts, the transmission lines were under the possession & control of Power Grid. The assessee was merely enabled to use the services of transmission of electricity and not the use of transmission wires per se. The assessee was not involved in the in the actual operations of the transmission lines. The transmission wires were also used by other customers of Power Grid. Consequently, the payments were not rent u/s 194-I;
 
(iii) Under the Explanation to s. 191, a person can be treated as an assessee in default u/s 201(1) only when, apart from the lapse in deduction of tax at source, the recipient of income has failed to pay such tax directly. S. 201(1) imposes vicarious (and not penal) liability on the payer to make good the shortfall in tax collection. If the tax liability is discharged by the recipient of income, the vicarious liability cannot be invoked.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Publishing Management System PMS News Management System Publishing Management System Development Online News Management System for media company custom Publishing management system development Survey management system Market Res

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions