Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: TDS
 
 
General »
  Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of the existing Bank Notes in the denominations of ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- (Updated as on November 30, 2016)
 Cases for tax scrutiny will be selected by machines
 Time to revisit 1997 direct tax rates, says P Chidambaram
 Lok Sabha passes Bill to tax black money deposits post demonetisation
 Last day to pay property tax with old notes
 Income tax department asks IDS declarants to pay tax by 30 November
 Why PM Narendra Modi must beware of the breathtaking Arthakranti tax
 Japanese firms seek easing of restrictions on funding in India
 Tax on black money: How the cookie will crumble
 Income tax officials say raids on jewellers based on 'credible intelligence' proving fruitful
 Exchange window being misused, government forced to reduce limit to Rs 2000, says Arun Jaitley

Centre moves SC for keeping CBI out of RTI
December, 20th 2011

At a time when it is debating with Team Anna over CBI's inclusion within the Lokpal's ambit, the Centre has moved the Supreme Court seeking to blunt petitions in various high courts challenging the June 9 notification exempting the investigating agency from the purview of Right to Information Act.

The ministry of personnel, public grievances and pension had issued the June 9 notification to include CBI, the National Investigating Agency ( NIA) and the National Intelligence Grid (Natgrid) in the Second Schedule of the RTI Act, thus putting these agencies outside the purview of the transparency law.

Six petitions were filed in high courts challenging the validity of the notification, of which two were in Delhi HC, two in Kerala HC and one each in Bombay and Madras HC. Of these, Madras HC gave a judgment on September 9 upholding the validity of the notification.

The Madras HC, while dismissing the challenge to the notification, had said, "...in the light of various sensitive cases which are being handled by the CBI, it cannot be denied that they have a direct bearing not only on national security but also financial security. We are convinced that the CBI would qualify to be defined as a security organization as well. Therefore, we find no error in the decision of the government of India to include the CBI in the Second Schedule of the RTI Act."

Buoyed by the favourable ruling from the Madras HC and apprehending possible conflicting verdicts on the issue of exclusion of CBI from the ambit of RTI, the Centre and the investigating agency decided to drive home the advantage and filed a petition seeking transfer of pending petitions before various HCs to the Supreme Court for an authoritative pronouncement on the validity of the notification.

The joint petition by the Centre and the CBI, drafted by advocate Padmalakshmi Nigam, stressed the Madras HC's ruling on what it called "a substantial question of general importance" and invoked Article 139A of the Constitution, which empowers the SC to transfer to itself petitions pending in HCs on identical issues.

Moreover, defending the litigation in several HCs on the same question of law could cause logistical problems, the Centre and the CBI said. "The interest of justice will be most served by transferring all the writ petitions pending before the various HCs to the Supreme Court and then the decision of the SC would govern the field and answer all the petitions in the country," the petitioners said.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Careers

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions