Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: empanelment
 
 
« Indirect Tax »
 Clarification Regarding Filing of Offline Challans with IEPF Authority under Companies Act
 Cash deposits in Jan Dhan accounts drop after govt warning: income tax dept
 Indirect tax receipts to see small, brief hit’
 There is no tax on interest income of up to Rs3 lakh a year for senior citizens
 Chidambaram favours change in direct tax rates
  Further rationalization of revised simplified procedure for fixation of brand rates
 Kerala to accept demonetised banknotes for payment of state tax till Nov 24
 Centre-state gridlock over GST jurisdiction remains, could threaten tax rollout
 India to levy tax on investments from Cyprus from April 2017
 Why tax radar may detect your cash deposits after Nov 8
 Income tax notices to religious, charitable trusts

Advance ruling under indirect tax
December, 12th 2011

Authoritative and binding advance rulings allow traders and investors to make business decisions regarding taxes and duties, in a stable and predictable environment. Advance rulings lend transparency and predictability to the tax environment, and have thus emerged as a valuable tool for achieving certainty in tax positions.

While in many countries, the concept of advance ruling has been introduced for existing tax payers, the idea was first pioneered in India in 1993, to offer a forum to non-residents for resolving questions pertaining to proposed transactions, and was limited to direct taxes only. It was only in 1999, that the concept of advance rulings was extended to Central Excise and Customs, and, in 2003, to Service Tax.

TAX CATEGORIES

Since inception, the ambit of advance rulings, as applicable to indirect taxes, has been widened with the years, and the categories of persons who can seek an advance ruling (as it stands today), under both the direct and indirect tax regimes, is as follows. It is clear that a far more expansive category of persons is eligible to seek advance rulings under direct tax vis--vis indirect tax.

Categories under direct tax regime:

(i) A non-resident

(ii) A resident in relation to a transaction with a non-resident

(iii) Residents notified by the Central Government

(iv) Public sector companies, where notified

Categories under indirect tax regime:

(i) A non-resident setting up a joint venture in India in collaboration with a non-resident or a resident

(ii) A resident setting up a joint venture in India in collaboration with a non-resident

(iii) A wholly-owned subsidiary Indian company, of which the holding company is a foreign company

(iv) A joint venture in India

(v) Residents notified by the Central Government

(vi) Public sector companies, where notified

However, despite the fact that the category of eligible applicants for advance rulings has been expanded from time to time, the response of the trade and industry has been, to say the least, lukewarm'. This is evident by the fact that the Authority for Advance Ruling set up for indirect tax matters has received only 146 applications, since its inception till March this year.

DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAX

It is interesting to note that in complete contrast to the above, the Authority for Advance Ruling set up to look into direct tax matters has been much more successful, in terms of the number of applications received and the general perception in the trade and industry. One of the biggest reasons for this disparity apart from the eligibility criteria is the difference of scope of Advance Rulings, as available under direct tax vis--vis the indirect tax regime.

Questions pertaining to direct tax:

1. No specific provisions specifying the nature of questions that may be raised.

2. Advance ruling can be sought on a question of law or fact relating to a transaction which the applicant has undertaken or proposes to undertake.

3. Specific prohibitions in the case of questions already pending before other authorities.

Questions pertaining to indirect tax:

1. Can be sought only on questions relating to classification, valuation, applicability of notifications, admissibility of CenVAT credit, and determination of liability to pay tax.

2. No other questions covered.

3. Can be sought only for transactions proposed to be undertaken.

Every year, the Central Government introduces amendments to the various indirect tax laws in the annual budget. Some of these amendments have, in the recent past, specifically under the service tax regulations, stirred huge debates, and have led to litigation at multiple levels, primarily due to the difference in interpretation by the tax payer and the revenue authorities.

If the scope of the advance ruling mechanism included within its ambit applications in relation to ongoing transactions, some of this litigation could have been limited, specifically in cases of classification of services, applicability of notifications, and issues pertaining to dual taxation under Service Tax, as well as Value Added Tax.

Given the increased litigation in indirect taxes, the Central Government, in the coming budget, should sincerely reconsider the recommendation of aligning the provisions relating to advance ruling under indirect tax laws, with the scheme prevailing under income tax. This would go a long way in not only reviving the confidence of the taxpayers, but also in realising the full potential of the system.

(The author is a senior tax professional with Ernst & Young, India. The views are personal.)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Contact Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions