Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Customs and Excise »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Notification No. 26/2021 Customs Ministry Of Finance
 Delhi Customs issues Covid-19 Facilitation Measures: Relaxation in Procedure for Inbonding of Cargo Import under Warehouse Bill of Entry
 Notification No. 32/2020 CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
  Notification No. 07/2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
 Notification No. 07/2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
 Notification No. 01/2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
  Notification No.91/2019 Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
 Notification No. 90/2019 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
 Notification No. 89/2019 Central Bord Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
 Notification No.88/2019 Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
 Notification No. 87/2019- Customs Ministry Of Finance

To move SC on excise issue
December, 11th 2009

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd on Thursday said that it would take up the case regarding excise classification of its Commander vehicles with the Supreme Court. This move comes after the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) rejected the companys appeal.

If the company loses the case, it will have to make differential excise duty payment of Rs 216.03 crore and a penalty of Rs 88.08 in connection with the classification of Commander range of vehicles as 10-seater ones during the period between 1991 and 1996. The company is looking for a stay order from the Supreme Court.

When contacted, the company's spokesperson denied to comment on the issue and the classification it is asking for.

In a filing with the BSE, the company said the classification of the vehicle as claimed by the company was on an earlier occasion upheld by the CESTAT in favour of it against which the department had preferred an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting