sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
« Customs and Excise »
 Clarification with respect to amendments to Customs and Central Excise notifications
 Procedure for disposal of un-claimed/un-cleared cargo under section 48 of the Customs Act, 1962, lying with the custodians
 Notification No. 95/2018-CUSTOMS (N.T.)
 Notification No. 3/2016-Customs (SG) Ministry of Finance
  Notification No.77/2018-Customs Ministry Of Finance
 Notification No.77/2018-Customs Ministry Of Finance
  Notification No. 22/2018-Central Excise Ministry Of Finance
 Notification No. 21/2018-Central Excise Ministry Of Finance
 Notification No. 85/2018 - Customs (N.T.) Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
 Ministry Of Finance Notification No. 69/2018 – Customs
 Ministry Of Finance Notification No. 70 /2018–customs

To move SC on excise issue
December, 11th 2009

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd on Thursday said that it would take up the case regarding excise classification of its Commander vehicles with the Supreme Court. This move comes after the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) rejected the companys appeal.

If the company loses the case, it will have to make differential excise duty payment of Rs 216.03 crore and a penalty of Rs 88.08 in connection with the classification of Commander range of vehicles as 10-seater ones during the period between 1991 and 1996. The company is looking for a stay order from the Supreme Court.

When contacted, the company's spokesperson denied to comment on the issue and the classification it is asking for.

In a filing with the BSE, the company said the classification of the vehicle as claimed by the company was on an earlier occasion upheld by the CESTAT in favour of it against which the department had preferred an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Bath SEO Company Birmingham SEO Company Bradford SEO Company Brighton and Hove SEO Company Bristol SEO Company Cambridge SEO Company Canterbury SEO Company Carlisle SEO Company Chester SEO Company Chichester SEO Company Coventry SEO Compan

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions