sitemap   Home | Registration | Expert Exchange | Viewer's Forum | Currency Converter | Apply for News Correspondent  
 
 

Finance Act 2008 enacted-Service Tax provisions to be in force

Salient features of Finance Bill, 2008 by Ved Jain

Salaried Class IT Refund information by Income Tax Deptt

 
   
 
News Search:
 
   
 
« From the Courts »
 SC modifies Advance Ruling on FBT and rules AAR with respect was not correct in its view in reading the words 'in India' after the word residence in sub-section (3)
 Whether the amortization loss computed under Rule 9A is subject to or not subject to the provisions of section 80 and section 139 of the Income Tax Act
 Powers of CIT - Cancellation of: Registration of charitable trust, Cancellation on mere search
 Capital Gains: Enhanced compensation received - Year of taxability: Law applicable
 Validity of: Exparte order - Condition precedent: Specific notice
 Validity of: Re-assessment - Fresh facts received
 Quite frequently, allegations of ‘benami-ship’ surface for content and refutation
 Payment of non­compete fee by the Assessee was a business expenditure and not a capital expenditure
 Claim of deduction on customs duty drawback under Section 80-IB of the Act- duty drawback is profit or gain derived from the business of an industrial undertaking
 SC rules a person will become an ordinarily resident only if he has been residing in nine out of ten preceding years; and he has been in India for at least 730 days in the previous seven years
 Full Bench of SC rules special audit of the accounts of the assessee-since an order under Section 142 (2A) does entail civil consequences, the rule audi alteram partem is required to be observed

Tax paid by employer on income of employee is entitled to exemption
December, 19th 2007

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

DELHI BENCH’F’ SPECIAL BENCH

 

BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDENT SHRI VIMAL GANDHI,

SHRI P.N. PARASHAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND

SHRI R.C. SHARMA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

 

I.T.A. No. 1810/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

 

I.T.A. No. 1811/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

 

I.T.A. No. 1812/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

 

I.T.A. No. 1813/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

 

I.T.A. No. 1814/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

 

I.T.A. No. 1815/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

I.T.A. No. 1837/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

 

I.T.A. No. 1838/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

 

I.T.A. No. 1839/Del/2006

Assessment Year: 2004-05

 

 

Appellant by: Shri S.K. Tuasiyan, Adv. Shri Rakesh Nangia, CA and

           Shri Neeraj Sharma, Adv.

Respondent by: Shri Durga Charan Dash, CIT (DR) and Smt. Y.S. Kakkar, DR

 

AND

INTERVENERS

 

 

Appellant by: Ms Anitha Sumanth, Adv. And Ms Preeti goel, CA

 

Respondent by: Shri Durga Charan Dash, CIT (DR), Shri Davendra Shankar, 

  CIT (DR) and Smt. Y.S. Kakkar, DR

 

 

Appellant by: None

 

Respondent by: Shri Durga Charan Dash, CIT (DR), Shri Davendra Shankar,

                          CIT (DR) and Smt. Y.S. Kakkar, DR