Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
« News Headlines »
 India is moving towards a flawed GST
 ICAI to organise two-day international conference in Hyderabad
 Here's how to calculate tax payable on your capital gains
 Income Tax calculations for the financial year 2016-17
 CPE Events 17 October - 22 October 2016
 High Court raps I-T Department for wrong tax demand
  CBDT signs 5 advance pricing pacts with Indian taxpayers
 Finance ministry warns tax officials of action against GST protest
 Big changes for small units under GST
 Parliament’s winter session to begin on November 16 to expedite GST rollout
 Income-tax (27th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - 92/2016

Tax implications of development agreements
December, 03rd 2007

Construction of flats under a development agreement is now the order of the day in urban areas. Generally, the land owner grants a power of attorney to the developer authorising him to sell an undivided interest in the land to the prospective buyer of the flat. The developer constructs flats and completes the projects within the stipulated time. How is capital gains worked out in such transactions?

Contrary views

One of the first cases on this issue was the Ashok Leyland Finance (230 ITR 398) case. The Madras High Court ruled that notwithstanding the description of the document as a development agreement, the subject matter of the transfer being an undivided share in the land, and the consideration being partly in money and partly a thing which was not in existence (the thing being a flat which the transferee was required to construct), a development agreement should be treated as an agreement for sale. This was in the context of Chapter XXC of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.

A contrary view was taken in the R. Vijayalakshmi vs Appu Hotels Ltd (257 ITR 4 Madras) case, wherein it was held there was no transfer when possession is given to the builder for construction for a specified period under the development agreement.

However, the Bombay High Court, shedding more light on the scope of the development agreement, pointed out that a transaction which allows possession to be taken in part-performance of contract should be treated as giving rise to a transfer under Sections 2(47)(v) and (vi) of the Income-Tax Act,1961.

Capital gains would be taxable in the year in which such transactions are entered into, even if the transfer of the immovable property is not effective or complete under the general law. Under Section 2(47)(v), any transaction allowing possession to be taken over or retained in part-performance of the contract of the nature referred to in Section 53(A) of the Transfer of Property Act would come within the ambit of Section 2(47)(v) of the I-T Act.

Power of attorney

Now comes the ruling in the Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (2007 294 ITR 196 AAR) case. Here, the assessee had given an irrevocable general power of attorney to the developer to develop the plot and construct housing units for sale. This meant that possession was given when the power of attorney was utilised. The AAR (Authority of Advance Ruling) held that the general power of attorney (GPA) unequivocally granted to the developer a bundle of possessory rights, the acts of management, and control and supervision of the property explicitly mentioned.

The GPA was not a mere licence to enter the land for doing some preliminary acts in relation to the development work; the power of control of the land, which was an incidence of possession, was conferred to the developers under the GPA.

The irrevocable GPA must be regarded as a transaction which allowed possession to be taken in part performance of the contract of transfer. Possession need not necessarily be sole and exclusively. The transfer within the meaning of Section 2(47)(v) must be deemed to have taken place on the date of execution of the irrevocable GPA, and capital gains must be held to have arisen during that year.

Once it is held that the transaction of the nature referred to in Section 2(47)(v) has taken place on a particular date, the actual date of taking physical position need not be probed into. It is enough if the transferee has by virtue of the transaction a right to enter upon and exercise the acts of the possession effectively. For determining the date of transfer, possession given to the developer need not ripen into an exclusive one on payment of instalments in entirety. There is no warrant to postpone the accrual of capital gains to a point of time when the concurrent possession will become exclusive possession of the developer or transferee on payment of full consideration.

The AAR had examined the various clauses in the development agreement. The conclusion reached is to the effect that capital gains accrued when irrevocable GPA is granted by the owner of the land. Possession is generally given for construction purpose. The ruling implies that even without the construction being complete, there will be liability for capital gains tax for the land owners when they execute the irrevocable GPA. To safeguard the interests of the land owner, much care will have to be taken in drafting the development agreement. Critics have assailed the AAR decision as spelling hardship to landowners. Probably, the CBDT can come up with a detailed clarification on the implications of development agreements.

T. C. A. Ramanujam
(The author is a former Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax.)
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions