sitemap   Home | Registration | Expert Exchange | Viewer's Forum | Currency Converter | Apply for News Correspondent  
 
 

Finance Act 2008 enacted-Service Tax provisions to be in force

Salient features of Finance Bill, 2008 by Ved Jain

Salaried Class IT Refund information by Income Tax Deptt

 
   
 
News Search:
 
   
 
« From the Courts »
 Part of the direct cost is attributable to the value of DEPB license. To find out the direct cost relatable to trading export, one has to reduce that part of the direct cost attributable to earnings of DEPB from the value of total direct cost
 "The interpretation of Section 254(2) regarding powers of the Tribunal" SC
 Only CAs can audit, certify sales tax returns: SC
 SC modifies Advance Ruling on FBT and rules AAR with respect was not correct in its view in reading the words 'in India' after the word residence in sub-section (3)
 Whether the amortization loss computed under Rule 9A is subject to or not subject to the provisions of section 80 and section 139 of the Income Tax Act
 Powers of CIT - Cancellation of: Registration of charitable trust, Cancellation on mere search
 Capital Gains: Enhanced compensation received - Year of taxability: Law applicable
 Validity of: Exparte order - Condition precedent: Specific notice
 Validity of: Re-assessment - Fresh facts received
 Quite frequently, allegations of ‘benami-ship’ surface for content and refutation
 Payment of non­compete fee by the Assessee was a business expenditure and not a capital expenditure

SC: CA firm cannot get tax deduction for depreciation of building
December, 03rd 2007
The Supreme Court has ruled that a firm of chartered accountants could not claim income tax deduction for depreciation of the buildings providing residential accommodation for its employees as they are 'professionals' and not doing business. Section 32 of the Income Tax deals with depreciation of buildings used for business.
 
In this case, GK Choksi & Co, a firm in Ahmedabad claimed deduction claiming that it was doing business. But the tax authorities stated that they were professionals.
 
The Gujarat High Court accepted the claim of the revenue authorities. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of the firm stating that Parliament had restricted the benefit only to assessees doing business.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2006 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.