Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Why you need not rush to file your ITR immediately
 Income tax returns: ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing
 Section 80DDB tax benefits for specified illnesses: 5 things to know
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Five tips to help taxpayers decide between old and new income tax regimes
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) available now on e-filing income tax portal
 How To Save Tax For Salary Above 15 Lakhs?

Bonanza for salaried
December, 25th 2007
Over the years, due to the reduction in the effective tax rates, the tax exemptions and deductions available to individuals/salaried employees have reduced. One such relief is provided for under Section 10 (10CC) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, whereby, the tax paid by the employer, on non-monetary perquisites is not considered to be taxable income in the hands of employees. Two issues need to be addressed in this context

Tax paid by the employer perquisite or salary

Whether tax paid by the employer is a perquisite or salary is not expressly stated under the Act. One view is that the tax being an obligation of the employee and met by the employer is to be treated as a perquisite. The other view is that the tax paid by the employer is no different from the salary paid to the employee and that it is merely an allocation of salary towards taxes.

If tax paid is a perquisite whether monetary or non-monetary?

If the tax paid by the employer is considered to be a perquisite, the next issue to be addressed is whether it is a monetary payment or a non-monetary perquisite.

The phrase monetary payment and non-monetary perquisites has not been defined under the Act and different views are expressed as to their classification. This distinction is important as it has a direct impact on the taxability of the employee, in terms of single or multiple grossing up and hence, the overall cost for the employer.

Recent decision of the Special Bench of Delhi Tribunal

In a recent decision, the Special Bench of Delhi Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that the tax paid by the employer on behalf of the employee would constitute a perquisite. Further, such tax payment to the government would not constitute monetary payment to the employee and therefore not subject to multiple grossing up.

Overall saving in the cost for the employer

As an illustration, if the employer agrees to pay Rs 100 net of tax salary to the employee in India and the tax rate is 34%. Then, if such a tax payment by the employer is considered to be a non-monetary perquisite then only Rs 34 shall be added to the taxable income of the employee. Whereas, if such tax payment by the employer is considered a monetary payment then Rs 34 will be subject to multiple grossing up and Rs 52 will be added in the taxable income of the employee, so that after paying a tax of 34% on Rs 152, the employee receives Rs 100 (approximately) net of tax salary.

More beneficial in case of employers not having taxable income

A down side of such relief is that the employer is not eligible to claim corporate tax deduction for such tax paid by it. This exemption, however, is important in case of employers enjoying tax holiday or those having no taxable income or losses in India, as theirs being no taxable income, no corporate tax deduction is claimed and hence, this relief is worth considering. The above ruling may be challenged by tax authorities at higher levels, however, till then this is a welcome ruling to claim relief and optimise overall employment costs by the employer.

Vikas Vasal
(The author is the executive director with KPMG)
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting