Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES
 
 
News Headlines »
 New board for indirect taxes to become operational from June 1
  9 changes that came into effect from April 1
 First time filing income tax? Here's all you need to know about Form 16 and Form 26AS
 New Opening Financial Controller Chartered Accountant (Manufacturing Plant) A Leading Company
 Income Tax Filing 2017: All you want to know about the single page ITR form SAHAJ
 How to benefit from investments in tax saving mutual funds
 60 per cent of income tax notices on fishy cash deposits returned
 All about income tax return form Sahaj
 Why seeing Form 26AS is a must before filing tax return and how to access it
 No tax on notice period pay cut
 Interpretation Of Central Goods And Services Tax (Cgst) Act (Part-1)

Tax relief for intra-corporate advances
December, 29th 2006

In a far-reaching judgement on intra-corporate advances, the Supreme Court has held that tax cannot be levied on a corporate if it transfers borrowed money to its subsidiary or any other entity, if the transaction is driven by commercial reasons.

The Supreme Court was deciding on the issue of whether interest on borrowed fund can be deducted in the computation of taxable income, even if the borrowed fund is transferred to a subsidiary company.

The apex court held that the only factor the income tax department should consider, is that if borrowing and advancing to a sister company is driven by commercial expediency. If the transaction is driven by objectives other than commercial, such deals cannot claim exemption from tax.

The Supreme Court added that if the directors of the sister concern utilise the money advanced to it for their personal benefit, it cannot be said such money has been given for commercial purpose.

We wish to make it clear that it is not in our opinion that in every case, interest on borrowed loan has to be allowed if the assessee advances it to a sister concern. It all depends on the facts and circumstances of the case, the court said.

Shri T P Ostwal, a senior chartered accountant, said: It is a decision that reflects the ground realities of doing business.

This courts judgement was related to a case involving SA Builders. This company had transferred Rs 82 lakh to its subsidiary company SAB Credit, out of the cash credit account in which there is a huge debit balance. It was an interest-free loan to the subsidiary.

The I-T department did not take the interest-free loan theory for granted. The departments opinion was that interest should have been claimed from the subsidiary by SA Builders.

It, therefore, disallowed deduction of over Rs 5 lakh as interest that should have been claimed from the subsidiary, while computing the expenditure by way of interest paid to the bank by SA Builders.

The Supreme Court held: It is true that borrowed amount in question was not utilised by the assessee in its own business but had been advanced as interest-free loan to its sister concern. However, in our opinion, that fact is not really relevant. What is relevant is whether the assessee advanced such amount to its sister concern as a measure of commercial expediency.

The apex court disagreed with contrary views taken by other appellate forums, including a Bombay High Court decision in Phaltan Sugar Works Vs Commissioner of Wealth Tax (1994) in which it was held that deduction under Section 36 (1) (iii) can only be allowed on the interest if the assessee borrows capital for its own business.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions