Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: VAT RATES
 
 
News Headlines »
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government
 Deadline to pay property tax in old currency extended
 Cabinet clears amendments to Income Tax Act
 Have you got interest on your income tax refund?

Tax relief for intra-corporate advances
December, 29th 2006

In a far-reaching judgement on intra-corporate advances, the Supreme Court has held that tax cannot be levied on a corporate if it transfers borrowed money to its subsidiary or any other entity, if the transaction is driven by commercial reasons.

The Supreme Court was deciding on the issue of whether interest on borrowed fund can be deducted in the computation of taxable income, even if the borrowed fund is transferred to a subsidiary company.

The apex court held that the only factor the income tax department should consider, is that if borrowing and advancing to a sister company is driven by commercial expediency. If the transaction is driven by objectives other than commercial, such deals cannot claim exemption from tax.

The Supreme Court added that if the directors of the sister concern utilise the money advanced to it for their personal benefit, it cannot be said such money has been given for commercial purpose.

We wish to make it clear that it is not in our opinion that in every case, interest on borrowed loan has to be allowed if the assessee advances it to a sister concern. It all depends on the facts and circumstances of the case, the court said.

Shri T P Ostwal, a senior chartered accountant, said: It is a decision that reflects the ground realities of doing business.

This courts judgement was related to a case involving SA Builders. This company had transferred Rs 82 lakh to its subsidiary company SAB Credit, out of the cash credit account in which there is a huge debit balance. It was an interest-free loan to the subsidiary.

The I-T department did not take the interest-free loan theory for granted. The departments opinion was that interest should have been claimed from the subsidiary by SA Builders.

It, therefore, disallowed deduction of over Rs 5 lakh as interest that should have been claimed from the subsidiary, while computing the expenditure by way of interest paid to the bank by SA Builders.

The Supreme Court held: It is true that borrowed amount in question was not utilised by the assessee in its own business but had been advanced as interest-free loan to its sister concern. However, in our opinion, that fact is not really relevant. What is relevant is whether the assessee advanced such amount to its sister concern as a measure of commercial expediency.

The apex court disagreed with contrary views taken by other appellate forums, including a Bombay High Court decision in Phaltan Sugar Works Vs Commissioner of Wealth Tax (1994) in which it was held that deduction under Section 36 (1) (iii) can only be allowed on the interest if the assessee borrows capital for its own business.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions