Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: due date for vat payment
News Headlines »
 GST panel to consult MSMEs in October end to further ease tax rigour
  How to check income tax return status
 Been Served a Notice by the Income Tax Department? Here’s How You Can Respond
 Seeks to amend the CGST Rules, 2017 - 45/2017 - Central GST (CGST)
 Government provides clarity on tax rate
 Processing of returns in Form ITR-I under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
  Filing of Reconciliation return in form 9 for the year 2016-17
  Today is last date for filing GSTR-1 forms for July; govt rules out further extension
 Today is last date for filing GSTR-1 forms for July; govt rules out further extension
 Refund of IGST paid on export of goods under Rule 96 of CGST Rules 2017
 Income-tax (23rd Amendment) Rules, 2017

Cost uncertainties of nuclear plants
December, 28th 2006
Controversies about nuclear vs. coal-fired technology aside, the more pertinent issue is comparative costs between the two, especially the hidden future costs.

NUCLEAR REACTORS being built at Koodankulam, Tirunelveli... - A. Shaikmohideen

The nuclear option in energy planning is never dormant in India. Globally, the debate got a fresh impetus when James Lovelock, proponent of the Gaia hypothesis the Earth keeping itself fit for life in early 2006 recommended nuclear energy to counter huge emissions of greenhouse gases, such as carbon-dioxide from coal-fired plants, and automobile exhaust.

The UPA Government's decision to set up five nuclear plants with a total capacity of 3000 MWe in the coastal areas of West Bengal, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra is a derivative of the India-US nuclear agreement. Mr Steve Kidd, Head of Strategy and Research at the World Nuclear Association in the US and a strong defender of President George Bush's Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP), made no bones of American interest in promoting nuclear power. The GNEP is "centred on the apparent change in the US strategy towards reprocessing used fuel, rather than continuing on the march towards repositories." In other words, the US concern is the repository of reprocessed uranium on the dismantling of nuclear weapons.

The idea of nuclear power brings out every kind of opposition, but its proponents argue that the contamination by coal-fired plants is understated while those of nuclear power units is exaggerated. Almost every radioactive mineral or compound is emitted into the atmosphere by thermal plants, states a well-known academician of the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. However, no International Atomic Energy Agency document endorses this view.

Controversies about nuclear versus coal-fired technology aside, the more mundane issue is comparative costs between nuclear and thermal power plants, especially the hidden future costs. This is a very difficult task, especially as the nuclear establishment is quite off-limits. This is why a multi-disciplinary endeavour a social cost-benefit analysis involving not only chartered and cost accountants but energy economists and technologists is indispensable.

Economics of Nuclear plants

Economics of nuclear plants is not strong enough despite the accusation that coal-based power plants are smokestacks that "belch millions of tonnes of carbon-dioxide, the main global warming gas". Energy Report, Which Energy? by the Institute of Science in Society bluntly states that nuclear energy is "extremely uneconomical." Referring to the British experience, the document warns, "Reprocessing spent fuel is no easier.

In June 2005, a leak of highly radioactive waste was discovered in the reprocessing plant at Sellafield containing enough uranium and plutonium to make several atomic weapons; and had gone unnoticed for more than eight months" which leads to "an exponential increase in the volume of hazardous radioactive wastes."

In the US context, the November 30 Fitch report on nuclear credit deserves mention. The ownership and operation of nuclear power plants can have a significant effect on the risk profile and credit ratings. True, "nuclear ownership can accrue benefits, including low and stable production costs and low carbon emissions, the high cost of construction and the potentially severe financial effect of an extended outage warrant a careful inspection of a company's financial flexibility, liquidity resources and nuclear operating performance. Yet, credit concerns relate basically to operating and regulatory risks, rather than construction and financing risks."

Fitch Senior Director, Mr Robert Hornick, points out, "The potential for an extended unplanned outage is the primary credit risk of nuclear ownership." A paper, High Costs, Questionable Benefits of Reprocessing by Ms J. Y. Suchitra and Mr M. V. Ramana (Economic and Political Weekly, November 25) worked out a major breakdown of reprocessing costs, of Tarapur, Trombay and Kalapakkam, based on 2004, taking the average output of 25 per cent capacity: Construction cost Rs 558.2 crore; construction of waste immobilisation plant Rs 164.25 crore; capital cost Rs 135.46 crore and decommissioning Rs 412 crore.

There are various hidden costs, pertaining to environment, not estimated till date. There are radioactive tailings whose damage potential is enormous as they carry carcinogens for at least 100 years.

But if one gives audience to the other side, and assumes that high-grade uranium will be available at affordable prices and readily, then the risk element comes to the fore and the risk and uncertainty analysis, thereof, is very cumbersome as shadow-pricing becomes complicated. Mr Robert N. Stavins, Director of the Environmental Economics programme at Harvard University, thinks that "both the short-term gains through efficiency and the longer-term gains from investments in research and switching to cleaner fuels" are main pricing or cost considerations.

Sankar Ray
(The author is a Kolkata-based freelance writer.)

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Company Search Engine Optimization Company US SEO Local SEO Company Website SEO Company Alabama SEO Company Alaska SEO Company Arizona SEO Company Arkansas SEO Company California SEO Company Colorado SEO Company Connecticut SEO Company Delawa

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions