Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Allahabad HC Orders GSTN to Modify Portal within 1 Month to Allow Appeals Even When Disputed Tax Shows Nil
 Statement Recorded By High Courts Can't Be Later Contradicted By Counsel : Supreme Court
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court

Shri Sanjeev Gupta, City Hospital and Maternity Home, Nursing Home Site 2, Opp. Sagar Cinema, Sector 16, Faridabad, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Faridabad.
November, 26th 2020

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘A’ NEW DELHI

(Through Video Conferencing)

BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT
AND

SMT. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ITA No. 760/Del/2020
Assessment Year : 2011-12

Shri Sanjeev Gupta, vs Income Tax Officer,

City Hospital and Maternity Home, Ward 2(3),

Nursing Home Site 2, Faridabad.

Opp. Sagar Cinema, Sector 16,

Faridabad,

Haryana 121002

(PAN: AAPPG7614P)

(Appellant) (Respondent)

Appellant by: None

Respondent by: Shri M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Date of hearing : 25 .11.2020

Date of pronouncement : 25.11.2020

ORDER

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned

CIT(A), Faridabad dated 31.12.2018 and pertains to assessment year 2011-
12.
ITA 760/D/2020

2. The learned counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 21.10.2020,
received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him
and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax
arrears for the assessment years under consideration under the Vivad Se
Vishwas Act, 2020 (in short ‘the Act').

3. Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4. In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal
of the appeal.

5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 25th

November, 2020.

Sd/- Sd/-

(MADHUMITA ROY) ( G.S. PANNU )
JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT

‘GS’

Copy forwarded to: -
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(A)
5. DR, ITAT

By Order
Assistant Registrar

 

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting