Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

No Tax applicable on Securities Premium even if used to set off losses: ITAT deletes addition against Hindustan Coca Cola
November, 25th 2020

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi Bench while deleting the addition against Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages held that no tax is applicable on securities premium even if used to set off losses.

The assessee, Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. is a private limited company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of aerated soft drinks under the brand name Coca Cola, Fanta, Limca, and manufacture and sale of packaged drinking water under the brand name Kinley.

It filed its return of income for the relevant assessment year declaring loss of Rs.282,90,29,838 while its liability as determined in Form No.29B for the purpose of levy of MAT was nil.

 

During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO noted that the assessee has claimed amortization of a non-compete fee of Rs.48.34 crores. Following his order for Assessment Year 2002-03 wherein such payment of non-compete fee was held to be capital expenditure, the AO disallowed the claim of Rs.48,34,13,706 as non-compete fee which was claimed by the assessee as revenue expenditure. The alternate claim of the assessee that depreciation should be allowed was also rejected by the AO.



The coram consists of R.K. Panda and Kuldip Singh while deleting the addition has held that security premium account, being part of the capital of the company is not in the nature of an entry bearing the character of income and since it has not been credited by debiting the Profit and Loss Account of the company, its reversal in any subsequent year is not required to be reflected in the profit and loss account.

In other words, applicability of clause (b) of Explanation to section 115JB(2) was ruled out.


Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting