Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court

M/s One Up Trade Net Works Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Value Added Tax Department Of Trade & Taxes
November, 15th 2019
$~37
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                         Date of Decision: 30th October, 2019
+      W.P.(C) 11469/2019
       M/S ONE UP TRADE NET WORKS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner
                     Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.

                          versus

       COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX
       DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES            ..... Respondent
                   Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC with Mr. J.P.
                   Bhatia, VATO Department (GNCTD)

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
                                    JUDGMENT
D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral)

CM APPL. 47165/2019 (Exemption)
       Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
       Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 11469/2019
1.     Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present writ
petition has been filed seeking refund of Rs.74,32,421/- alongwith interest
under Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 for the fourth quarter, i.e. 1st
January 2014 to 31st March, 2014 on the ground that the input tax credit is
more than output tax credit.       Learned counsel for the petitioner further
submitted that an application for refund had already been preferred on 6th
August, 2019 which is pending with the respondent and hence, let a suitable
W.P.(C) 11469/2019 Page 1 of 2 direction be given to the respondent to decide the claim of this petitioner with interest in accordance with law after giving an adequate opportunity of being heard to this petitioner. 2. Having heard the counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct the concerned respondent authority to decide the claims of the petitioner for refund with interest in accordance with law, rules, regulations, Government policy and keeping in mind the evidences on record, as early as possible and practicable preferably within a period of eight weeks from today. 3. With this observation, this writ petition is hereby disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR, J OCTOBER 30, 2019 ns W.P.(C) 11469/2019 Page 2 of 2
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting