sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 GE Energy Parts Inc vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 PCIT vs. Perfect Circle India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Plot No. 1, Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, vs. DCIT, Circle- 16(1), Room No. 312, C.R. Building New Delhi.
 Smt. Ritu Malik T-236, DB Gupta Road, Phara Ganj, New Delhi – 110055 vs. ITO, Ward – 62 (5) New Delhi
 Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd. B 9, LGF Green Park (Main) New Delhi 110 016 vs. ACIT Circle 9(1), Room No.194 C.R.building I.P.Estate New Delhi
 DCIT, Circle-2, Meerut. vs. Reeta Singhal, A-312, Prahlad Vatika, Khair Nagar, Meerut.
 Contata Solutions Pvt.Ltd. A-16/9, Vasant Vihar New Delhi 110 057 vs. ITO, Ward 6(3), Room No.376A Central Revenue Building I.P.Estate New Delhi 110 002
 Late Sh. D. K. Jain Through Legal Hier Mrs. Usha Jain D-19, Nizamuddin East New Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-32(1) New Delhi.
 Shri Neeraj Puri 74-C, Rajpur Road Dehradun Vs. The Pr. C.I.T Dehradun
 Ashok Kumar S/o Sh. Hari Kishan Hingo Kheri, Kandela D- Shamli vs. ITO, Ward – 1 (4) Shamli
 Satish Kumar, Rra Taxindia, D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi – 49 Vs. Ito, Ward 2(3), Faridabad

Shri Himanshu Goel, E-1/11, 2nd Floor, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi 057. vs The ACIT, Circle-33(1), New Delhi.
November, 02nd 2018
         IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
         DELHI BENCHES "FRIDAY BENCH" : DELHI

BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, A.M.

              Stay Application No.750/Del./2018
                         Arising out of
     ITA.No.6521/Del./2018 - Assessment Year 2015-2016

Shri Himanshu Goel,
E-1/11, 2nd Floor, Vasant     vs. The ACIT, Circle-33(1),
Vihar, New Delhi ­ 057.           New Delhi.
PAN ADWPG2724N
         (Applicant)                     (Respondent)

                For Assessee : Ms. Himani Agarwal, C.A.
                For Revenue : Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. D.R.

              Date of Hearing : 02.11.2018
      Date of Pronouncement : 02.11.2018

                            ORDER

PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.

          The Stay Application has been filed by the assessee

seeking stay of the outstanding demand of Rs.11,52,640/- for

the A.Y. 2015-2016.


2.        We have heard the Learned Representatives of both

the parties and perused the material available on record.
                                 2
                                       SA.No.750/Del./2018 Shri Himanshu
                                                         Goel, New Delhi.








3.         The A.O. treated the income from sale of shares of

M/s. Kappac Pharma Ltd ("KPL") should be taxed under the

Head "Income from other sources"         instead of        "Short term

capital gains" declared by the assessee. The return of income

is filed declaring total income of Rs.63,43,750/- and ultimately

even after change of the head of income, the total income

remains the same. According to Learned Counsel for the

Assessee, assessee has already paid 20% of the total demand

of Rs.2,31,000/-.


4.         Considering the facts of the case, we are of the view

that the balance payment of Rs.9,21,640/- shall have to be

stayed till disposal of the appeal. It is a case of change of head

of income only and as such, assessee has a prima facie case

for grant of stay. We, accordingly, stay the balance demand of

Rs.9,21,640/- for a period of six months or the disposal of

appeal whichever expires earlier. Appeal of assessee be fixed

for hearing on 14.01.2019, for which date no separate will be

issued   to   both   the   parties.   Assessee     shall    not    seek
                               3
                                      SA.No.750/Del./2018 Shri Himanshu
                                                        Goel, New Delhi.








unnecessary adjournment in the matter. Stay Application is

allowed. Copy of the Order be provided to both the parties.


5.         In the result, stay application of the assessee is

allowed.


           Order pronounced in the open Court.

     Sd/-                                    Sd/-
    (LP SAHU)                               (BHAVNESH SAINI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                           JUDICIAL MEMBER

Delhi, Dated 02nd November, 2018

VBP/-

Copy to
1.   The appellant
2.   The respondent
3.   CIT(A) concerned
4.   CIT concerned
5.   D.R. ITAT `FRIDAY' Bench, Delhi
6.   Guard File.

                     // BY Order //



           Assistant Registrar : ITAT Delhi Benches :
                          Delhi

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Quality Assurance Services Testing and Re-testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions