M/s Nogle Technologies Pvt. Ltd., C/o Aristole Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., 1st Floor, Sincere Tower, Plot No. 4, Near Preet Vihar Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi. vs. ITO Ward 18(4), New Delhi. |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH: `SMC' NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
I.T.A .No.-4552/Del/2018
(ASSESSMENT YEAR-2014-15)
M/s Nogle Technologies Pvt. vs ITO
Ltd., Ward 18(4),
C/o Aristole Consultancy Pvt. New Delhi.
Ltd., 1st Floor, Sincere Tower,
Plot No. 4, Near Preet Vihar
Community Centre,
Preet Vihar, Delhi.
PAN No. AADCN5003G (RESPONDENT)
(APPELLANT)
Appellant by None
Respondent by Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing 20/11/2018
Date of Pronouncement 20/11/2018
ORDER
This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order
dated 27.02.2018 of the Ld. CIT(A), New Delhi relevant to assessment
year 2014-15.
2. In this case the Notice was sent to the assessee for hearing for
today i.e. 20.11.2018 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide
Column No. 10. However, the same was returned back with the
postal remarks "No such person".
3. On 20.11.2018, neither the assessee nor her Authorised
Representative attended the hearing and also not filed any
Application for adjournment or nor filed the fresh address before the
Tribunal, hence, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be
ITA Nos. 4552/D/2018 2
A.Y. 2014-15
Nogle Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
served to serve the notice again and again on the same address. In
view of above, it is thus inferred that the assessee is not interested in
prosecution of her Appeal.
4. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules and following
various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of
Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 (Delhi) and Hon'ble Madhya
Pradesh High Court's decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs.
CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), I treat this appeal as unadmitted and
dismiss the same. I would like to clarify that subsequently, if the
assessee explains the reasons for non appearance and if the Bench is
so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of
adjudication of the Appeal.
5. In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.
Order pronounced on 20.11.2018.
Sd/-
(H.S. SIDHU)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 20/11/2018
*Kavita
Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5. DR: ITAT
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITAT, NEW DELHI
ITA Nos. 4552/D/2018 3
A.Y. 2014-15
Nogle Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Date
1. Draft dictated on 20.11.18
2. Draft placed before author 20.11.18
3. Draft proposed & placed before the 20.11.18
second member
4. Draft discussed/approved by Second 20.11.18
Member.
5. Approved Draft comes to the 20.11.18
Sr.PS/PS
6. Order Pronounced and Uploaded 20.11.18
7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 20.11.18
8. Date on which file goes to the AR
9. Date on which file goes to the Head
Clerk.
10. Date of dispatch of Order.
|