|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
« DCIT, Circle –23(2) New delhi vs Second Realtors Pvt.... | Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Cochin)... » |
Braham Kaur W/o Late Sh. Kripal Singh, Vill-Kithauli, Bhagpat Road, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. vs. ITO Ward 1(2), Meerut. |
|
November, 19th 2018 |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH: `SMC' NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
I.T.A .No.-4394/Del/2018
(ASSESSMENT YEAR-2009-10)
Braham Kaur vs ITO
W/o Late Sh. Kripal Singh, Ward 1(2),
Vill-Kithauli, Bhagpat Road, Meerut.
Meerut, Uttar Pradesh.
CQSPB0609N
(APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT)
Appellant by None
Respondent by Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing 19/11/2018
Date of Pronouncement 19/11/2018
ORDER
This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order
dated 21.09.2017 of the Ld. CIT(A), Meerut relevant to assessment
year 2009-10.
2. In this case the Notice was sent to the assessee for hearing for
today i.e. 19.11.2018 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide
Column No. 10.
3. On 19.11.2018, neither the assessee nor her Authorised
Representative attended the hearing and also not filed any
Application for adjournment or nor filed the fresh address before the
Tribunal, hence, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be
served to serve the notice again and again on the same address. In
view of above, it is thus inferred that the assessee is not interested in
prosecution of her Appeal.
ITA Nos. 4394/D/2018 Braham Kaur 2
4. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules and following
various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of
Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 (Delhi) and Hon'ble Madhya
Pradesh High Court's decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs.
CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), I treat this appeal as unadmitted and
dismiss the same. I would like to clarify that subsequently, if the
assessee explains the reasons for non appearance and if the Bench is
so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of
adjudication of the Appeal.
5. In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.
Order pronounced on 19.11.2018.
Sd/-
(H.S. SIDHU)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 19/11/2018
*Kavita
Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5. DR: ITAT
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITAT, NEW DELHI
ITA Nos. 4394/D/2018 Braham Kaur 3
Date
1. Draft dictated on 19.11.18
2. Draft placed before author 19.11.18
3. Draft proposed & placed before the
second member
4. Draft discussed/approved by Second 19.11.18
Member.
5. Approved Draft comes to the 19.11.18
Sr.PS/PS
6. Order Pronounced and Uploaded 19.11.18
7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 19.11.18
8. Date on which file goes to the AR
9. Date on which file goes to the Head
Clerk.
10. Date of dispatch of Order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting
|
|
|
|
|
|