Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India
From the Courts »
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Pavitra Commercial Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
 Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens Network Pvt Ltd)
 SKY Light Hospitality Llp Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -28(1), New Delhi
 Tax outgo may rise for investors in companies undergoing M&A cases
 Rajat B Mehta vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Seema Sabharwal vs. ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
  Vikram Singh vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Shree Gopal Housing & Plantation Corporation (Bombay High Court)
 Kudrat Sandhu vs. UOI (Supreme Court)
  Vikram Singh vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)

Shri Rajesh Aggarwal, C-17, Satyawati Colony, 17, Satyawati Colony, 17, Satyawati Colony, Ashok Vihar, Ashok Vihar, hok Vihar, Phase-III, New Delhi. New Delhi.Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, Circle- Circle-19(1), New Delhi.
November, 21st 2015
                                `F' : NEW DELHI
                    DELHI BENCH `F

                           SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                        ITA No.
                      Assessment Year : 2001-

Shri Rajesh Aggarwal,          Vs.    Assistant Commissioner of
C-17, Satyawati Colony,               Income Tax,
Ashok Vihar,                          Circle-19(1),
Phase-III,                            New Delhi.
New Delhi.
     (Appellant)                          (Respondent)

            Appellant by       :     None.
            Respondent by      :     Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Senior DR.

     Date of hearing           :     19.11.2015
     Date of pronouncement     :     20.11.2015


     This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2001-02 is
directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-XXII, New Delhi dated 31st
December, 2012.

2.   At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee-
appellant. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee is being disposed of
ex-parte qua the assessee-appellant on merits after hearing the
arguments of learned DR.

3.   The only ground raised by the assessee is against the levy of
penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 at `20,94,574/-. The
assessee has filed a written submission pointing out that this addition
has been deleted by the ITAT in the quantum proceedings vide ITA
                                     2                         ITA-3109/Del/2013

4.     We have considered the submissions of the learned DR and have
perused the relevant material placed before us.         We find that the
penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act has been levied in pursuance to the
assessment order dated 24th November, 2008 passed u/s 143(3)/148.
However, in the quantum appeal, the ITAT quashed the reopening of
assessment u/s 148 and consequentially, the assessment order passed
in pursuance thereto was also quashed vide ITA No.151/Del/2010,
order dated 19th August, 2015. Since the assessment order itself has
been quashed, the addition made therein cannot survive and
consequently, the penalty based upon such addition cannot be
sustained. Accordingly, the same is cancelled.

5.     In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
       Decision pronounced in the open Court on 20.11.2015.

             Sd/-                                       Sd/-
      (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA)                               AGRAWAL)
                                                     (G.D. AGRAWAL)
         JUDICIAL MEMBER                             VICE PRESIDENT


Copy forwarded to: -

1.     Appellant    : Shri Rajesh Aggarwal,
                      C-17, Satyawati Colony, Ashok Vihar,
                      Phase-III, New Delhi.

2.     Respondent : Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
                    Circle-19(1), New Delhi.
3.     CIT
4.     CIT(A)
5.     DR, ITAT

                               Assistant Registrar
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Quality Assurance Services Testing and Re-testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions