Shri Pramod Pandey, B-67, Sarita Vihar, 67, Sarita Vihar, 67, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi New Delhi 110 076. 110 076. 110 076. Vs.
November, 20th 2015
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
`F' : NEW DELHI
DELHI BENCH `F
BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND
SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA,
Nos.3219/Del/2013, 3220/Del/2013 & 3221/Del/2013
Years : 2003-
Assessment Years 2004-05 & 2005-
2003-04, 2004- 2005-06
Shri Pramod Pandey, Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
B-67, Sarita Vihar, Income Tax,
New Delhi 110 076. Circle-10,
PAN : AALPP2708H. New Delhi.
Appellant by : None.
Respondent by : Smt. Nandita Kanchan, CIT-DR.
Date of hearing : 17.11.2015
Date of pronouncement : 18.11.2015
PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP :-
These appeals by the assessee for the assessment years 2003-
04, 2004-05 & 2005-06 are directed against the order of learned
CIT(A)-XXXII, New Delhi dated 22nd February, 2013.
2. At the time of hearing before us today i.e. 17th November, 2015,
neither anybody appeared on behalf of the assessee nor there was any
request for adjournment. The notice of hearing was duly sent to the
assessee by registered post. Earlier also on 25.11.2013 and
12.05.2014, the appeals were adjourned at the request of the
3. In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the assessee is
not interested in prosecuting these appeals. While taking this view, we
derive support from the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of
2 ITA-3219 to 3221/D/2013
CIT vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd.  38 ITD 320 (Delhi).
Accordingly, we dismiss the assessee's appeals in limine.
4. In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed in
Decision pronounced in the open Court on 18.11.2015.
(SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) AGRAWAL)
JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT
Copy forwarded to: -
1. Appellant : Shri Pramod Pandey,
B-67, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi 110 076.
2. Respondent : Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Circle-10, New Delhi.
5. DR, ITAT