sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
« VAT (Value Added Tax) »
 Pending VAT comes to haunt companies claiming input tax credit
 One-time settlement of VAT, excise disputes in the works
 Haryana government uploads photos of VAT defaulters
 Filing of online return for 4th quarter of 2017-18 extension of period thereof.
 No Cenvat credit admissible on outward transportation services from factory to buyer’s premises
  Filing of reconciliation return in form 9 for the year 2016-17
 Govt may send notice to 162 companies; ask for VAT returns
 Cenvat Credit Is Not Income Liable To Be Taxed
 Cos wanting to claim VAT refund on employees' foreign stay can get professional help
 Regarding disposal of pending form DVAT 04 & 07 Form Applications
 Disposal of pending Form DVAT 04 & Form DVAT 07 applications: regarding

No VAT on brand franchisee fee without transfer of effective control over brand
November, 19th 2015

No VAT on brand franchisee fee without transfer of effective control over brand

State of Karnataka, Bangalore Vs. United Breweries Ltd. [2015 (11) TMI 754 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT]

United Breweries Limited (“the Respondent”) being owner of Kingfisher Brand entered into contracts with certain Contract Bottling Units (“CBUs”) for manufacturing of beer.

In terms of the contract:

  • The Respondent transferred know-how for manufacturing beer to CBUs which was on non-assignable, non-transferable and non-exclusive basis;

  • The CBUs manufactured beer as per the specifications given by the Respondent using his trade marks, names and logos and the entire production was made available to the Respondent;

  • The right to market, sell, distribute and package the beer remained under the supervision and control of the Respondent;

  • The CBUs neither had any right over the product, nor did they have any right to sell or exploit the beer so produced, nor fix any price of the product.

The Respondent received payments from CBUs as 'brand franchise fees' and paid Service tax on the same. However, the Assessing Officer levied Sales tax on such payments by treating these as royalty.

The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka held that it is settled law that Sales tax can’t be attracted until effective control is transferred. Since CBUs did not get effective control over the brand name as such, it could not be considered as sale of intangible goods. It was further held that since the Respondent had already paid Service tax on the amount received as brand franchise fees, double taxation on same goods is not permissible.

 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Development Software Programming Software Engineering Custom Software Development Requirement Based Software Development Software Solutions Software Serv

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions