Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment
 
 
Transfer Pricing »
 The transfer pricing conflict is about profit shifting
 Transfer Pricing Compensating Adjustments: Another IRS Loss
 HMRC steps up inquiries into cross-border deals by big business
 An Overview of Transfer Pricing in China
 South Africa: transfer pricing record-keeping rules finalized
 India among the top three nations where transfer pricing policies faced official examination: EY Survey
 Vietnam publishes draft transfer pricing law to combat tax avoidance
 New transfer pricing documentation rules and fiscal assessment procedure in Finland
 India, US resolve tax disputes worth Rs 5,000 crore via APA
 India, UK sign three Advance Pricing Agreements
  Foreign Exchange Management (Insurance) Regulations, 2015

New transfer pricing rules to be less taxing
November, 20th 2015

The declining trend in the income tax department’s estimates of alleged income suppression by multinational companies would get buttressed, thanks to the new set of transfer pricing (TP) rules issued earlier this week.

The declining trend in the income tax department’s estimates of alleged income suppression by multinational companies would get buttressed, thanks to the new set of transfer pricing (TP) rules issued earlier this week.
Currently, transfer pricing adjustments become necessary when the transaction price with related parties abroad reported by a company varies from the arm’s length price or a benchmark industry standard beyond a specified limit (+/-3%). As per the new rule, however, if the price being audited falls between 35th and 65th percentile of the data set, it would be considered as arm’s length price and so no TP adjustments would be needed.

Under the Income Tax (16th Amendment) Rules, 2015, a “range concept” is introduced, which means the taxman would use median of six comparable transactions by other players in the industry to compute the extra taxable income, instead of the average or the arithmetic mean of the comparable prices. Since the median of the comparable prices could often be closer to the transaction price being audited compared to the average of the selected prices, any extra income that may be attributed to the MNC for deviating from the arm’s length price may be smaller than what is currently being attributed in many cases.
transfer-pricing

TP adjustments sought by the I-T department had grown exponentially from R1,220 crore in 2005-06 to over R70,000 crore in 2012-13 but has since declined to R47,000 crore in 2014-15. While MNCs have expressed concern over the rise in TP adjustments, the tax officers have been advised by the government to refrain from high-pitch assessments that could drive investors away. The fact that the revenue department’s TP figures routinely got struck down by tribunals and courts also forced it to be more realistic. As reported by FE recently, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has directed its field officers to refrain from manual selection of transactions for scrutiny based on the threshold value and instead restrict audit to cases only where the revenue risk to the government is huge. Also, an assessing officer will have to give a structured opportunity of hearing the taxpayer before a case is referred to a transfer pricing officer.

“The introduction of range concept and the use of multi-year analysis is expected to have a significant favourable impact on transfer pricing compliance and litigations,” said Rahul Mitra, national head, litigation and dispute resolution, transfer pricing and direct taxes, KPMG India.

“Though it has come a bit late in the day, finalisation of rules is a welcome step. The explanation with elaborate illustrations is helpful in reducing ambiguity,” said Amit Maheshwari, partner, Ashok Maheshwary & Associates.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Experience

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions