Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: cpt
 
 
From the Courts »
 M/s Fiberfill Engineers Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Del Vs. Mrs. Tara Sinha
 Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, New Delhi & Ors.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3 Vs. Delhi State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corp. Ltd.
 CIT vs. D. K. Garg (Delhi High Court)
 The Citizens Cooperative Society Ltd vs. ACIT (Supreme Court)
 Digipro Import & Export Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
  CIT vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (Supreme Court)
  DCIT vs. Hita Land Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
 GTC Industries Limited vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) (Special Bench)
 Premlata Purshottam Paldiwal vs. CIT (Bombay High Court)

Manoj Kumar Bansal,211, New Delhi House,27, Barakhamba Road,New Delhi. Vs. ACIT (OSD), Ward-37(1), New Delhi.
November, 19th 2015
         IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
            DELHI BENCHES : SMC-II : NEW DELHI
     BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                          ITA No.1920/Del/2015
                         Assessment Year : 2001-02

Manoj Kumar Bansal,                   Vs.    ACIT (OSD),
211, New Delhi House,                        Ward-37(1),
27, Barakhamba Road,                         New Delhi.
New Delhi.

PAN: AAHPB3134F

     (Appellant)                               (Respondent)

              Assessee By        :    Shri R.C. Raj, Advocate
              Department By      :    Shri M.K. Jain, Sr. DR

           Date of Hearing              :    23.10.2015
           Date of Pronouncement        :    17.11.2015

                                     ORDER
       This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the

CIT(A)-XX, New Delhi, dated 21.01.2015 for assessment year 2001-02.

2.     After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material on

record, I hold as follows.
                                                              ITA No.1920/Del/2015


3.   I first dispose of ground No.1, which reads as follows:-

      "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as in
      law, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) grossly erred in:-
      a) Holding that the Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 was
      validly served on the appellant.

      b) Holding that the objection for re-opening of the assessment was
      disposed of by the ld. Assessing Officer.

      c) Holding that re-opening of the assessment is valid which is
      otherwise bad in law and without jurisdiction.

      d) Holding that the copy of adverse material used against the
      assessee was provided to the assessee."





4.   On the issue of service of notice, the ld.CIT(A) at para 5.2 states

that the assessee has responded to the notice issued u/s 148, vide his letter

dated 23.10.2008 and, hence, there is no valid ground to state that notice

u/s 148 has not been served. In my view, such plea cannot be taken. The

AO has evaded the issue whether the notice u/s 148 was served or not.

The assessee has been contending all along that no notice was served on

it. The contention was raised before the ld. AO also. The jurisdictional

High Court in the case of CIT vs. Ishan Holdings Ltd. (2009) TIOL 495

(Del) and in the case of CIT vs. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, 311 ITR 235, has

decided in favour of the assessee.        Thus, this assessment has to be
                                      2
                                                                 ITA No.1920/Del/2015


annulled as without jurisdiction on the sole ground of non-service of

notice u/s 148 of the Act on the assessee. Even otherwise, admittedly, the

assessee has filed his objections for re-opening of assessment. The AO

has not disposed of these objections. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in

the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Tupperware India Pvt.

Ltd., in ITA No.415/2015, vide para No.6, has held as follows:-

     "6. The Court is of the considered view that after having correctly
     understood the decision of the Supreme Court in G.K.N. Driveshafts (India)
     Ltd. (supra) as mandatorily requiring the AO to comply with the procedure
     laid down therein and to dispose of the objections to the reopening order with
     a speaking order, the CIT(A) committed an error in not quashing the
     reopening order and the consequent assessment."






5.   Respectfully following the jurisdictional High Court decision, we

hold the assessment is bad in law.

6.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

     The order pronounced in the open court on 17.11.2015.
                                                              Sd/-


                                                 [J.SUDHAKAR REDDY]
                                                ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated, 17th November, 2015.

dk
                                        3
                                ITA No.1920/Del/2015




Copy forwarded to:

  1.   Appellant
  2.   Respondent
  3.   CIT
  4.   CIT (A)
  5.   DR, ITAT
                         AR, ITAT, NEW DELHI.




                     4

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System developers CMS developers Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions CMS India Content Management System India CMS development India Website CMS Website Content Management India Portal CMS India CMS Outsourcing CMS Vendor Complete CMS Custom CMS Services

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions