Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: VAT RATES
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

Income Tax Officer, Ward 46(2), Room No. 307, Civic Centre, d Block, 3rd Floor, Vs. Smt. Mukta Kapoor, R/o Flat No. A-63, Ayush Vihar, Sector-13, Dwarka, New Delhi
November, 20th 2015
                                                              ITA NO.4720/Del/2013


                      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                          DELHI BENCH "E", NEW DELHI
                  BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                      AND
              SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                      I.T.A. No. 4720/DEL/2013
                              A.Y. 2008-09
INCOME TAX OFFICER,                    VS. SMT. MUKTA KAPOOR,
WARD 46(2),                                R/O FLAT NO. A-63, AYUSH
ROOM NO. 307, CIVIC CENTRE,                VIHAR, SECTOR-13, DWARKA,
            RD
`D' BLOCK, 3 FLOOR,                        NEW DELHI
NEW DELHI ­ 1
(APPELLANT)                                     (RESPONDENT)

            Department by               :   Sh. P. Dam Kanunjna, Sr. DR
             Assessee by                :   None Present


                                               11-2015
                          Date of Hearing : 17-11- 2015
                                            18-11-
                          Date of Order : 18-     2015
                                               11-2015

                                ORDER

PER H.S. SIDHU : JM

      The Revenue has filed this appeal on 07.8.2013 against the consolidated
order dated 27.5.2013 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XXX, New Delhi on the
following grounds:-

      "1.    Deleting the addition of Rs. 3111671/- as rightly made by the AO
      on account of unexplained cash deposits which remained unexplained
      and the addition was made on the basis of information in his possession:




      2.     Deleting the addition of Rs. 3111671/- made by the AD which
      remained unexplained as the assessee could not explain the source of
      cash deposits satisfactorily during the remand proceeding.


                                        1
                                                                 ITA NO.4720/Del/2013


       3.     Treating the deposits in assessee's bank account as business
       receipts and applying a rate of 5% of the turnover u/s 44AF of the I.T. Act
       without appreciating the fact that the assessee has not filed any
       documentary evidence of business income and has throughout submitted
       that she was a salaried person.

       4.     Deleting the penalty u/s 271(1) (c) amounting to Rs. 1062534/- as
       rightly imposed by the AO without considering the fact that the assessee
       did not avail opportunities to submit its version both at the time of scrutiny
       and penalty proceedings:

       "The appellant craves the right to alter, amend, add or substitute the groin
       us of appeal."

2.     At the time of hearing, we noticed that Assessee has filed 3 Appeals being
Appeal Nos. 1171/11-12, 1177/12-13 & 1178/12-13 before the Ld. First Appellate
Authority against the Order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s. 144 of the I.T.
Act, 1961 and other orders passed u/s. 271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act,
1961 for the assessment year 2008-09 and Ld. CIT(A) has decided                these
appeals vide his consolidated order dated 27.5.2013 by partly allowing the
appeal u/s. 144 and allowed other two appeals by deleting the penalty u/s.
271(1)(b) & 271(1)(c) in dispute.

3.     Aggrieved by the consolidated order dated 27.5.2013, Revenue has filed
the present Appeal before the Tribunal.

4.     After hearing the Ld. DR and perusing the records, we find that in spite of
the RPAD issued to the assessee two times, neither the assessee nor his
representative appeared to prosecute the matter in dispute. Therefore, we
decided to proceed exparte assessee.

                                          2
                                                                ITA NO.4720/Del/2013


4.1    We find that the Appeal filed by the Revenue is a `Defective' one,
because the Department has filed a combined Appeal before the Tribunal
against the Ld. CIT(A)'s consolidated order dated 27.5.2013 which were against
the separate assessment orders being dated 20.12.2010 passed u/s. 144 of
the I.T. Act, 1961 and other orders passed u/s. 271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c) of the I.T.
Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2008-09, which is not maintaninable in the
eyes of law.       However, as per Rules, the Department ought to have filed
separate appeals before the Tribunal against the consolidated order of the Ld.
CIT(A). Therefore, the present Appeal has become `Defective' and is dismissed
as such. But in the interest of justice, the Department is at the liberty, if so
advised, can file separate appeals before the Tribunal, against the consolidated
order dated 27.5.2013, which will be entertained, as per Rules.




5.     In the result, the Appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.

       Order pronounced in the Open Court on 18/11/2015.

     Sd/-
     Sd/-                                                        Sd/-
                                                                 Sd/-
          MAHARISHI]
[PRASHANT MAHARISHI]                                            SIDHU]
                                                          [H.S. SIDHU]
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

Date: 18-11-2015
"SRBHATNAGAR"
Copy forwarded to: -
1.     Appellant -
2.     Respondent -
3.     CIT
4.     CIT (A)
5.     DR, ITAT                  TRUE COPY                        By Order,


                                                              Assistant Registrar,
                                                              ITAT, Delhi Benches


                                        3

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Desktop Application Development Outsourcing Desktop Application Development Offshore Desk

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions