Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

HB Estate Developers Ltd. H-72, Cannaught Circus, New Delhi Vs. DCIT, Circle-12(1), C.R. Building, New Delhi
November, 23rd 2015
             IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                   DELHI BENCH: `C ': NEW DELHI

            BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                AND
               SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                           ITA No. 758/Del/2012
                          Assessment Year: 2001-02

Sh. Gurjeet Singh Nalwa,              Vs.         Asstt. Commissioner of
Govind Nagar, Saharanpur.                         Income Tax, Saharanpur.
(PAN: ASLPK9397H)
    (Appellant)                                 (Respondent)
                                   And
                           ITA No. 759/Del/2012
                          Assessment Year: 2001-02

Sh. Harjeet Singh Nalwa,              Vs.         Asstt. Commissioner of
Govind Nagar, Saharanpur.                         Income Tax, Saharanpur.
(PAN: ABQPN5498L)
    (Appellant)                                   (Respondent)

     Assessee by : None
     Department by : Sh. Yatendra Singh, Sr. DR

                                     Date of hearing: 17.11.2015
                                     Date of pronouncement: 20.11.2015
                                   ORDER

PER O.P. KANT, A.M.:

       These appeals by the two different assessees are directed against the

respective orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Muzaffarnagar,

dated 14.10.2011 in relation to the assessment year 2001-02.






2.     Earlier, the present appeals came up for hearing before this bench on

16.04.2012, on which date, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite

issuance of notice and the case was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order

dated 16th April, 2012. This Bench vide order dated 01.03.2013, recalled the
                                       2
                                                      ITA Nos. 758 &759/Del/2012

order dated 16.04.2012 passed in M.A. Nos. 250 & 251/Del/2012 and fixed the

appeals for hearing on 16.07.2013, which was duly intimated to the assessees'

counsel. On 16.07.2013, the appeals were adjourned on the written request of

assessees' counsel. Again on 06.08.2014, none appeared on behalf of the

assessee and the case was dismissed for non-prosection vide order dated 6th

August, 2014. The order dated 6th August, 2014 was recalled by this Bench vide

order 15.05.2015 passed in M.A No. 12 & 13/Del/2015 and the appeals were

fixed for hearing on 30.06.2015. Again the aforesaid appeals came for hearing

before this bench on 17.11.2015. Notices of hearing were issued to the assessees

on the address given by the assessees in Form No. 36, Column no. 10. However,

in spite of the same, neither the assessees or their Authorized Representatives

appeared to prosecute the matter in dispute, nor filed any application for

adjournment.

2.    It seems that the assessees are not interested in prosecuting the appeals

and therefore, we are of the view that no useful purpose would be served by

issuing notice again and again to the assessees on the same address. Considering

these facts and keeping in view of the provisions of Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules,

as were considered in the case of Multi Plan India which is reported in 38 ITD

320 (Del.) and also in view of the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of






Madhya Pradesh in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs CWT

reported in 223 ITR 480 (MP), we dismiss both the appeals in limine for non-

prosecution. The assessees, if so advised, shall be free to move this Tribunal
                                          3
                                                          ITA Nos. 758 &759/Del/2012

praying for recalling of the order and explaining the reasons for non-compliance,

if any, and if the bench is so satisfied on the reasons, then this order may be

recalled.

3.     In the result, both the appeals filed by different assessees are dismissed.


       The decision is pronounced in the open court on 20th November, 2015.


          Sd/-                                               Sd/-
    (DIVA SINGH)                                         (O.P. KANT)
 JUDICIAL MEMBER                                    ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 20th November, 2015.
RK/-
Copy forwarded to:
1.     Appellant
2.     Respondent
3.     CIT
4.     CIT(A)
5.     DR
                                                         Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting