Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt :: empanelment :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
« From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

M/s. Jyoti Impex, No. 207, Zest Business Spaces, M G Road, Ghatkopar (East), Mumbai -400 077 Vs Income-Tax Officer Ward-22(1)(2), Mumbai
November, 25th 2014
                      "J"                       

           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                 MUMBAI BENCH "J", MUMBAI
       .   ,    ,    ,                                                 
          BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND
                    SHRI VIVEK VARMA, JM

                        . 353/Mum/2014
             STAY APPLICATION (SA) No. : 353/Mum/2014
               in ITA No. 6534/Mum/2014 for AY 2010-11
     M/s. Jyoti Impex,                Vs   Income-Tax Officer ­Ward-
     No. 207, Zest Business Spaces,        22(1)(2),
     M G Road, Ghatkopar (East),           Mumbai
     Mumbai -400 077
        .:PAN: AAFFJ 8683 D
      (Appellant)                                (Respondent)
                       Applicant by    :   Shri Harish V S
                     Respondent by     :   Shri N Padmanaban

     /Date of Hearing
                                             : 21-11-2014
    /Date of Pronouncement                   : 21-11-2014

                                    
                                 ORDER
    ,  :
PER VIVEK VARMA, JM:


        Instant Stay Application has been filed by the assessee, praying
for the stay of demand of Rs. 8,91,009/-.

2.      After submitting the merits of SA, the AR submitted that the
assessee is prepared to deposit 25% of the impugned demand, which
he agrees to deposit by 15th December, 2014. The AR also prayed that
since the assessee is ready with the merits, the case may kindly be
fixed at an early date.




3.      The DR submitted that the application deserves to be rejected or
the assessee pays fully.

4.      We have heard the submissions, and we accept the proposal of the AR
to deposit 25% of Rs. 8,91,009/-, which comes to Rs. 2,22,752/- (say Rs.
                                         2                   . : 213/ /2014
                                                            SA 213/Mum/2014
                                                        M/s. Jyoti Impex
2,25,000/-) on or before 15.12.2014. We also accept the AR's request for
early hearing.

5.      We, therefore, hold that the assessee shall deposit Rs. 2,25,000/- by
15.12.2014 and also order the Registry to fix the case for regular hearing on
18.12.2014, which shall be subject to proof of payment of Rs. 2,25,000/-.




6.      As a result, the SA as filed is partly allowed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 21st November, 2014.



                  Sd/-                                          Sd/-
         (.   )
                                                            (  )
                                                                 
(D. KARUNAKARA RAO)                                         (VIVEK VARMA)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                         JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Date: 21st November, 2014


     /Copy to:-
        1)  /The Applicant.
        2)     /The Respondent.
        3) The CIT (A)- 33, Mumbai
        4) The CIT-22, Mumbai,
        5)     "J"     ,                  /
            The D.R. "J" Bench, Mumbai.
        6)  
           Copy to Guard File.
                                             /By Order
          / / True Copy / /


                                                          / 
                                                     ,                 
                                                 Dy./Asstt. Registrar
                                                  I.T.A.T., Mumbai
*Chavan

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Mission

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions