sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
« Transfer Pricing »
 Indian advance pricing agreement uses customs value as arm’s length price
 Indian advance pricing agreement uses customs value as arm’s length price
  How advance pricing agreement helps India-Singapore business ties
 Doing business in India: ‘Substance’ over ‘form’ in transfer pricing regime
 How advance pricing agreement helps India-Singapore business ties
  CBDT to accept transfer pricing MAP sans riders
 How transfer pricing documentation can make you a happier person
 Transfer pricing review and adjustments in Luxembourg
 Here is what Modi government can do for transfer pricing
 Transfer Pricing In International Transactions – An Overview
  Transfer pricing 2017 year-in-review

Income tax considerations for wealth transfer planning
November, 24th 2014

Income taxes have become an increasingly important factor in wealth transfer planning since the passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. In the past, the federal estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes (“transfer taxes”) have been higher than combined federal and state income taxes, which meant wealthy families were more concerned about transfer taxes than income taxes. Currently, the maximum transfer tax is 40%, whereas combined federal and state income tax rates may be higher for certain individuals. For example, if you are a married Georgia resident who files jointly and your taxable income is greater than $457,600 in 2014, you will be subject to the top federal income tax rate of 39.6%, the top Georgia income tax rate of 6%, as well as possibly incurring the new 3.8% Medicare surtax on some of your income. As a result of these changes, planning for the 3.8% surtax, when feasible, has become part of the new normal.

For individuals, the 3.8% surtax is imposed on the lesser of (1) the taxpayer’s net investment income (i.e., interest, dividends, income from passive activities, etc., less any deductions attributable to such income), or (2) the excess of the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income (i.e., your gross income less certain deductions, such as those for alimony and health savings accounts) over $250,000 (if married and filing jointly). Thus, a married-filing-jointly taxpayer with $400,000 of modified adjusted gross income, of which $300,000 is net investment income, will pay an extra 3.8% on $150,000 of that income. This is because the lesser of net investment income ($300,000) or the excess of modified adjusted gross income over $250,000 ($400,000-$250,000=$150,000) is $150,000. This is an extra $5,700 in tax that you would not have paid prior to 2013.

The 3.8% surtax particularly affects those clients who are beneficiaries of trusts. The surtax likely will apply to a large percentage of the trust’s income. For trusts, the surtax applies to the lesser of (1) the net investment income that is not distributed to a beneficiary, or (2) the excess of a trust’s adjusted gross income over $12,150 (in 2014). If a trust has $200,000 of income, all of which is net investment income because it is derived from dividends and/or interest, and none of which is distributed to a beneficiary, almost the entire amount ($200,000-$12,150, as that is less than the net investment income of $200,000) is subject to the 3.8% surtax. This surtax matters especially if the trust holds interests in a closely-held business because the income derived from such a business will be deemed to be passive (and thus net investment income) unless the trustee “materially participates” in the business. The law is unsettled as to what constitutes material participation and exactly how many trustees need to be involved if there is more than one trustee. However, there are general guidelines. Accordingly, whom you wish to name as trustee of a trust that does, or will, ultimately hold closely-held business interests is even more important now.

We recommend reviewing your estate plan to see how the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 may have affected your planning, particularly if you hold low-basis assets and/or interests in a closely-held business.

Any specific planning must be considered on an individual basis. The above discussion is not intended as a specific recommendation for you. Please contact us to discuss how we can help you take advantage of these and other opportunities.


Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Publishing Management System PMS News Management System Publishing Management System Development Online News Management System for media company custom Publishing management system development Survey management system Market Res

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions