Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

M/s Vabsak Properties Pvt.Ltd., Pvt.Ltd.,A----22,Delhi 110 092.Vs.Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Officer, New Delhi.
November, 12th 2013
              IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                               `H' : NEW DELHI
                   DELHI BENCH `H

                       G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND
           BEFORE SHRI G.D.AGRAWAL,
                                GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
            SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG,

                              No.2787/Del/2013
                          ITA No.
                                          2004-05
                        Assessment Year : 2004-


M/s Vabsak Properties           Vs.    Income Tax Officer,
Pvt.Ltd.,                              Ward-17(1),
                                       Ward-
A-22, Anand Vihar,                     New Delhi.
Delhi ­ 110 092.
PAN : AABCV6198G.
     (Appellant)                           (Respondent)

            Appellant by         :    Shri Salil Agarwal, Advocate and
                                      Shri Shailesh Gupta, CA.
            Respondent by        :    Shri Sameer Sharma, Sr.DR.

                                 ORDER

    G.D.AGRAWAL, VP :
PER G.D.AGRAWAL,
     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of
learned CIT(A)-19, New Delhi dated 14th December, 2012 for the AY
2004-05.


2.   The assessee has raised various grounds of appeal.         However,
ground No.2 of the assessee's appeal which goes to the root of the
matter reads as under:-





     "That the learned CIT(Appeals) having found that the
     objections raised by the assessee before the Assessing
     Officer against the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 of the
     Act, were not disposed off by the Assessing Officer, has
     erred in holding the same to be only a procedural error.
                                     2                        ITA-2787/Del/2013


      That the learned CIT(Appeals) ought to have quashed the
      assessment order."


3.    We have heard both the sides and perused the material placed
before us. We find that the issue raised by the assessee vide ground
No.2 of its appeal is fully covered by the decision of Hon'ble Apex
Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
and Others ­ [2003] 259 ITR 19 (SC), wherein their Lordships held as
under:-


      "When a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act,
      1961, is issued, the proper course of action for the noticee
      is to file the return and, if he so desires, to seek reasons for
      issuing the notices.    The Assessing Officer is bound to
      furnish reasons within a reasonable time.        On receipt of
      reasons, the noticee is entitled to file objections to
      issuance of notice and the Assessing Officer is bound to
      dispose of the same by passing a speaking order."


4.    In the case under appeal, though the assessee has filed the
objection against the issue of notice under Section 148, the Assessing
Officer, in the assessment order under Section 143(3), mentions "The
objections filed by the assessee were disposed off". That during the
remand proceedings before the learned CIT(A), the Assessing Officer
admitted that no separate/written order was passed on the objection of
the assessee. That despite the above remand report, learned CIT(A)
upheld the order of the Assessing Officer which was in complete
violation of ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court.


5.    Learned DR, on the other hand, relied upon the orders of
authorities below.
                                        3                    ITA-2787/Del/2013




6.          After considering the arguments of both the sides and perusing
the material placed before us, we are of the opinion that in the case
under appeal before us, the procedure laid down by the Hon'ble Apex
Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. (supra) has not been
followed by the Assessing Officer. As per Hon'ble Apex Court, after the
receipt of notice under Section 148, the assessee has a right to ask for
the reasons for issuing the notices. The Assessing Officer is bound to
furnish the reasons recorded for reopening of assessment. On receipt
of reasons, the assessee is entitled to file the objection to the issuance
of notice and thereafter, the Assessing Officer is bound to dispose of
the same by passing a speaking order.           In the case under appeal
before us, the assessee has filed the objection to the issuance of notice
and the Assessing Officer failed to dispose of the same by passing a
speaking order.        During remand proceedings, the Assessing Officer
admitted that no such written order was passed disposing of the
assessee's application. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has failed to
follow the direction given by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of GKN
Driveshafts (India) Ltd. (supra). In the above circumstances, we deem
it proper to set aside the orders of authorities below and restore the
matter to the file of the Assessing Officer with the following directions:-


     (i)         That he will dispose of the assessee's objection raised
                 against the reopening of assessment in accordance with
                 law by passing a speaking order and will supply the copy
                 thereof to the assessee.
     (ii)        That if he is of the opinion that assessment is validly
                 reopened, then, he will proceed to make the assessment
                 afresh de novo in accordance with law after allowing
                 adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
                                    4                           ITA-2787/Del/2013





7.    Since we have entirely set aside the assessment order, the other
grounds raised by the assessee with regard to merits of the addition of
`20 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 need no
adjudication.


8.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is deemed to be allowed
for statistical purposes.
      Decision pronounced in the open Court on 8th November, 2013.


                   Sd/-                                  Sd/-
                     GARG)
     (CHANDRA MOHAN GARG)                      (G.D.AGRAWAL)
        JUDICIAL MEMBER                        VICE PRESIDENT

Dated : 08.11.2013
VK.

Copy forwarded to: -

1.    Appellant     : M/s Vabsak Properties Pvt.Ltd.,
                   A-22, Anand Vihar, Delhi ­ 110 092.

2.    Respondent : Income Tax Officer,
                Ward-17(1), New Delhi.
                Ward-
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR, ITAT

                              Assistant Registrar

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Vision

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions