sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Union of India vs. Pirthwi Singh (Supreme Court)
 Cromption Greaves Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Modiluft Ltd.
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Royal Airways Ltd.
 Lally Motors India (P.) Ltd vs. PCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
  Mehsana District Co-operative vs. DCIT (Gujarat High Court)

Mangatram Arora Finance Ltd,04 Shiv Darshan, Sarojini Road, Santacruz West Mumbai 400054 Vs. ACIT Central Circle 43, Room No.653, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, MK Road Mumbai 400020
November, 26th 2012
                                    MA No.309 of 2011 Mangatram Arora Finance Ltd Mumbai



             IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                        "I" Bench, Mumbai

          Before Shri B.R. Mittal, Judicial Member and
           Shri B. Ramakotaiah, Accountant Member

                       M.A. No.309/Mum/2011
              (Arising out of IT(SS) No.148/Mum/2006)
                 (Block Period: 1.4.1990 to 07-02-2001)

Mangatram Arora Finance Ltd,      Vs.     ACIT Central Circle 43,
04 Shiv Darshan, Sarojini                 Room No.653, 6th Floor,
Road, Santacruz West                      Aayakar Bhavan, MK Road
Mumbai 400054                             Mumbai 400020
PAN: AAACM 5684 P
(Appellant)                                    (Respondent)

                    Assessee by:   Shri M. Subramanian,
                    Department by: Shri Amardeep, DR

                    Date of Hearing:       09/11/2012
                    Date of Pronouncement: 23/11/2012






                             ORDER

Per B. Ramakotaiah, A.M.

      This     Miscellaneous Application is arising out of IT(SS)
No.148/Mum/2006. The order in the above appeal along with the
Revenue appeal in IT(SS) No.167/Mum/2006 was posted on
15.10.2008 and as none appeared on behalf of assessee, the appeal
was decided ex-parte on merits. Assessee has preferred the present
M.A requesting for recall of the order invoking Rule 24.
2.    Assessee filed affidavit explaining the reasons for non
appearance on 15.10.2008 as they have wrongly noted down the
date as 16.10.2008 and also due to ill health of Mr. Mangatram
Arora, Director of the Company which caused delay in filing the M.A
after they came to know that the case was heard ex-parte on
15.10.2008. The Director also filed an affidavit explaining the
reasons and also stating that they have not approached the Hon'ble
High Court in appeal and as assessee's application is well within the
time, the order may please be recalled.



                                Page 1 of 2
                                      MA No.309 of 2011 Mangatram Arora Finance Ltd Mumbai



3.       The learned Counsel in the course of the arguments also
placed on record the order of the High Court of Judicature at
Bombay in the case of Executors of the Estate of Keshavdev R.
Ganeriwala, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer in ITA no 1472 of 2007
dated 15.07.2008 to submit that when the issue is one of the
violation of principles of natural justice, the ITAT can recall its
order.

4.       After hearing the learned Counsel and the learned DR, we are
satisfied that there is sufficient cause for non appearance when the
appeal was called on for hearing on 15-10-08. We hereby set aside
the ex-parte order and restore the appeal for fresh hearing. The case
is fixed for hearing on 19.02.2013 and both the parties were
informed in the open court. Therefore, issuance of separate notice is
dispensed with.






5.       Appeal in IT(SS)No.148/Mum/2006 is recalled for fresh
hearing and to decide afresh after hearing both parties.

6.       In the result, miscellaneous application filed by assessee is
allowed.

         Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd November, 2012.



                Sd/-                                 Sd/-
            (B.R. Mittal)                      (B. Ramakotaiah)
          Judicial Member                     Accountant Member

Mumbai, dated 23rd November, 2012.
Vnodan/sps
Copy to:
  1. The Appellant
  2. The Respondent
  3. The concerned CIT(A)
  4. The concerned CIT
  5. The DR, "I " Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                                By Order


                          Assistant Registrar
                     Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
                       Mumbai Benches, MUMBAI
                                  Page 2 of 2
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions