Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« VAT (Value Added Tax) »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Gujarat slashes tax on ATF by 5 per cent
 CENVAT Credit can’t be denied If ISD invoices issued for distribution of ITC prior to Registration
 1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
 1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
 Pending VAT comes to haunt companies claiming input tax credit
 One-time settlement of VAT, excise disputes in the works
 Haryana government uploads photos of VAT defaulters
 Filing of online return for 4th quarter of 2017-18 extension of period thereof.
 No Cenvat credit admissible on outward transportation services from factory to buyer’s premises
  Filing of reconciliation return in form 9 for the year 2016-17
 Govt may send notice to 162 companies; ask for VAT returns

Developers, consumer groups spar over VAT
November, 03rd 2012

After failing to get any relief on Valued Added Tax (VAT) from the Bombay High Court, real estate developers are taking on consumer groups saying they are misleading people who bought properties between June 2006 and March 2010 by urging them to not pay the 5% VAT charged by the state government.

Around two lakh citizens in the city are likely to face the heat with the Confederation of Real Estate Developers Associations of India (CREDAI), too, saying VAT has to be collected from buyers. CREDAI also said consumer organisations are misleading people over VAT.

CREDAI-Pune Metro said concumer rights activist Sudhakar Velankar had contradicted his recent media statements by saying before the Bombay High Court that builders have the legal right to recover VAT from flat purchasers but in a judicious manner. President of CREDAI-Pune Metro Satish Magar said the PIL thus is line with their contention that VAT should be recovered from consumers.

Velankar, the founder-president of Grahak Hitwardhini had filed a PIL seeking a directive from the HC to the state government to adopt only one method of assessment, and until such time amend the Act allowing flat purchasers to pay the lowest assessable amount.

Velankar, on the other hand, countered that CREDAI is misleading the public as one of the contentions in court is that builders shouldnt collect VAT from customers.

Magar, however, said that in compliance with the interim order of the Supreme Court on payment of VAT most developers have filed returns with the government and paid tax. Magar said they are waiting for a response from the state government about lowering VAT from 5% to 1%. The matter was expected to be decided on Wednesday but had not come through.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting