Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Customs and Excise »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Notification No. 26/2021 Customs Ministry Of Finance
 Delhi Customs issues Covid-19 Facilitation Measures: Relaxation in Procedure for Inbonding of Cargo Import under Warehouse Bill of Entry
 Notification No. 32/2020 CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
  Notification No. 07/2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
 Notification No. 07/2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
 Notification No. 01/2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
  Notification No.91/2019 Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
 Notification No. 90/2019 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
 Notification No. 89/2019 Central Bord Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
 Notification No.88/2019 Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
 Notification No. 87/2019- Customs Ministry Of Finance

Carmaker Fiat India seeks review of Supreme Court order on excise duty payment
November, 02nd 2012

Carmaker Fiat India has sought review of a Supreme Court order directing it to pay about 360 crore as additional excise duty on sales of its Uno cars between 1996 and 2001.

"We have filed a review petition," said V Lakshmi Kumaran, lawyer for Italian carmaker Fiat's Indian unit, without giving further details. The court had passed the order on August 29.

The case pertains to Fiat's joint venture with Mumbai-based Premier Automobiles at the time. Fiat was importing completely-knocked-down kits of its popular Uno hatchback and selling them in the country below cost price. This prompted the tax authorities to levy the duty on the cost price of the company's Uno hatchbacks.

Fiat, however, contested the move, arguing that excise duty should be levied on the sale price, which in this case was less than the cost of production.

Premier, the other party in the case, had filed a clarification application within a month of the Supreme Court order, according to Tarun Gulati, partner in Delhi-based law firm Economic Laws Practice.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting