Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd
 
 
From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

Ajanta Pharma Ltd., Ajanta House, Charkop, Kandivili (West), Mumbai 400067 Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 9(1) Mumbai-400020
November, 06th 2012
                                   SA No.252 to 255 of 2012 Ajanta Pharma Limited Mumbai




          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     "A" Bench, Mumbai

       Before Shri B. Ramakotaiah, Accountant Member
            and Shri Amit Shukla, Judicial Member

                  SA No.252 to 255/Mum/2012
        (Arising out of ITA No.7888 to 7891/Mum/2011)
              (Assessment years: 2000-01 to 2003-04)

Ajanta Pharma Ltd., Ajanta       Vs.    Asstt. Commissioner of
House, Charkop, Kandivili               Income Tax, Range 9(1)
(West), Mumbai 400067                   Mumbai-400020
PAN: AAACA 5579 P
(Appellant)                                   (Respondent)

                  Assessee by:   Shri Madhur Agarwal,
                  Department by: Shri Mohit Jain, DR

                  Date of Hearing:       02/11/2012
                  Date of Pronouncement: 02/11/2012




                             ORDER

Per B. Ramakotaiah, A.M.

      These stay petitions are filed by assessee seeking stay of
demand to an extent of `.1.97 crores in all the years. It was
submitted that the demand arose in view of the penalties levied
consequent to disallowance of commission paid to a foreign party on
the basis of Volcker committee report. Assessee paid commission to
M/s Galala & Co which was treated as `kickback' to the Iraqi
Government and therefore, not allowable as per Explanation to
Section 37(1). Further, the quantum appeals are pending before the
ITAT, whereas AO levied penalty on the amounts so disallowed.
2.   It was further submitted that the ITAT has taken different
stands in various cases depending on the facts and there are orders
from Kolkata `B' Bench allowing the expenditure, whereas the other
orders disallowing the commission expenditure. The issue is not
free from doubt and is debatable in nature. Therefore, penalty




                               Page 1 of 3
                                     SA No.252 to 255 of 2012 Ajanta Pharma Limited Mumbai




under section 271(1)(c) is not warranted. It was further submitted
that out of `.1.97 crores demand raised, assessee has already paid
`.1.00 crore in various assessment years and the unpaid amount is
only `.97.85 lakhs which is less than 50% of the demand raised. It
was further submitted that if the disallowance at all has to be made
on the basis of the Volcker Committee Report, as the report
indicates only an amount of US$ 1700 on the basis of Ministry of
Financial Data and projected ASSF levy on the basis of policy
document at US$ 197,507/-. In all the report mentions about US$
200,139/- which translates to `.88.06 lakhs. If these amounts were
to be considered, the penalty leviable may work out about `.34.00
lakhs, whereas assessee has already paid three times of that
amount being `.1.00 crores so far. In view of this it was submitted
that the balance amount may please be stayed.




3.    The learned DR, however, objected to the stay petitions.

4.    Considering the prima facie case made out by assessee and
also on the fact that only an amount of `.88.06 lakhs was reported
in the Volcker Committee Report as payments by assessee, there is
a prima facie case in favour of assessee. Considering the fact that
assessee discharged more than 50% of the penalty so levied so far,
we grant stay of the balance demand for a period of six months or
disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier. Since quantum appeal
is already posted on 21.02.2013, these cases are also fixed on the
same day i.e. 21.02.203. Both the parties were informed accordingly
and issuance of separate notice is dispensed with.

5.    In the result stay applications filed by assessee are allowed.

      Order pronounced in the open court on 2nd November, 2012.

             Sd/                                    Sd/-
        (Amit Shukla)                         (B. Ramakotaiah)
     Judicial Member                         Accountant Member
Mumbai, dated 2nd November, 2012.




                                 Page 2 of 3
                                      SA No.252 to 255 of 2012 Ajanta Pharma Limited Mumbai




Vnodan/SPS

Copy to:

   1.   The   Appellant
   2.   The   Respondent
   3.   The   concerned CIT(A)
   4.   The   concerned CIT
   5.   The   DR, " A " Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                                By Order



                          Assistant Registrar
                     Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
                       Mumbai Benches, MUMBAI




                                  Page 3 of 3
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Company Search Engine Optimization Company US SEO Local SEO Company Website SEO Company Alabama SEO Company Alaska SEO Company Arizona SEO Company Arkansas SEO Company California SEO Company Colorado SEO Company Connecticut SEO Company Delawa

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions