sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 M/s A Daga Royal Arts vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
 Gagan Infraenergy Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 PCIT vs. Chawla Interbild Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 All India Federation of Tax Practitioners vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Union of India vs. Pirthwi Singh (Supreme Court)

I-T dept to recover upto Rs 1000 crore
November, 26th 2009

The Income-Tax (I-T) department will recover close to Rs 1,000 crore from infrastructure development companies after a recent tax tribunal order clarified that the exemption available for infrastructure development cannot be extended to contractors or sub-contractors.

The order puts an end to the practice of contractors and sub-contractors claiming benefits under section 80 IA of Income-tax Act, which was incorporated to encourage investment in infrastructure projects.

While deciding an appeal by Belgaum-based BT Patil & Sons Construction, the three-member bench of the Income-Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, held that the provision in the Income-tax Act is only for enterprises engaged in infrastructure projects, and therefore cannot be extended to work contracts and sub-contracts.

With this order, issued in October-end, contractors and sub-contractors who moved ITAT and Commissioner (Appeals) against tax demand on them would now have to pay tax. In certain cases, the I-T department is planning to reopen assessments.

Significantly, the ITAT order also underscores retrospective aspect of the provision. The provision was given retrospective effect from 2000 by an amendment made in 2007.

The ITAT held that the explanation, as inserted by Finance Act 2007 with retrospective effect from 1/4/2000, made it clear that the benefit of section 80 IA shall not apply to a person who executes a works contract entered into with the eligible enterprise.

The ITAT Bench, comprising GC Gupta, Pramod Kumar and RS Syal, observed that the language of the provision clearly explained the intention of the legislature so much so that even if a work contract is undertaken by a sate or central government, it cannot avail the benefit under section 80 IA of the I-T Act.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions