Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income Tax Return Filing: 10 Mistakes To Avoid When Filing ITR For AY 2024-25
 Old vs New Tax Regime: Who should move to the New Tax Regime from the old one?
 Income Tax Calculator FY 2023-24: How To Know Your Tax Liability Online On IT Dept's Portal?
 BackBack Income Tax Act amendment on cards on tax treatment of MSME dues
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing. Check details here
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Experts share these 8 benefits for taxpayers in new income tax regime
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80

Pooja Bhatt gets a breather in tax case
November, 18th 2008

Actress Pooja Bhatt has got a reprieve from the tax demand on the $6,000 she received for performing in Canada. A tax tribunal has ruled that she is liable to pay tax only in Canada, the place where the income was generated.

The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, said the India-Canada double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA) provides for taxing the income earned by artists at the source country. The income under question belongs to assessment year 1994-95.

Ms Bhatt had already paid $900 in Canada as tax deducted at source. The IT department, however, raised a demand on the artist, on the presumption that under the Income-tax Act of India, the entire global income of Ms Bhatt can be taxed in India the country of her residence. The departments order was upheld by the commissioner (appeal) the first appellate authority on tax matters. Ms Bhatt then approached the ITAT, Mumbai.

The ITAT, in its order last month, held that Ms Bhatts income could not be taxed in India in the context of India-Canada DTAA, which clearly states that income may be taxed in the source country. The ITAT took into account a similar issue that came up before the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Torqouise Investment & Finance.

In this case, the court, following the decision of the Madras High Court in the case of SRM Firm and others, held that income arising on the sale of immovable property in Malaysia cannot be taxed in India. In this case, the Supreme Court had affirmed the view of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting