Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income Tax Return Filing: 10 Mistakes To Avoid When Filing ITR For AY 2024-25
 Old vs New Tax Regime: Who should move to the New Tax Regime from the old one?
 Income Tax Calculator FY 2023-24: How To Know Your Tax Liability Online On IT Dept's Portal?
 BackBack Income Tax Act amendment on cards on tax treatment of MSME dues
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing. Check details here
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Experts share these 8 benefits for taxpayers in new income tax regime
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80

FE Editorial : Take left
November, 20th 2008

Nothing typifies the high noon of policy heterodoxy in the current economic crisis than the seeming political unity around oldfashioned Keynesian economics with a twist-spend your way out of recession with a mix of public spending and tax cuts. Orthodoxy on the Left would normally prefer government spending while the orthodox right would prefer tax cuts. However, there is a convergence this time around with almost everyone, including in the US and UK, favouring both simultaneously. What is more surprising is that the Left (typified by the Democrats in the US and Labour in the UK) has done a better job of selling tax cuts to the general public.

Consider the essential difference between John McCain and Barack Obamas tax-cut plans. While both would reduce the average tax burden, Obamas plan raises the taxes of the richest (those earning more than $227K a year) while reducing the taxes of those earning lessnotably, in terms of reducing their taxes as percentage of after-tax income. It is the lowest income groups who benefit most from Obamas plan. Assuming that these groups have higher marginal propensities to consume from additional income than richer groups (and thats a reasonable assumption), putting proportionately more money into their hands will boost the economy faster. Also, taxing the richest groups more assuages worries about a secular deterioration of the deficit. McCains plan had wanted to reduce taxes for the richest as well and proportionately less for the lowest income groups. Another part of the debate on taxes and spending is underway in the UK. Again, the Labour governments plan to cut proportionately more taxes for the lower income groups while retaining spending programmes is more popular than the Conservative plan to reduce taxes and reduce spending (or keep tax rates steady and increase spending) in the interests of fiscal prudence. In times of bust, that it is okay to run a deficit is the political-popular mantra. What about India? Given our limited tax base and fairly low rates of income tax and corporate tax, a direct tax cut may not achieve much by the way of increasing consumption. In Indias case, spending programmes that can be quickly implemented plus indirect tax cuts seem a better option. Note, in India, left-of-centre parties or groups have cut headline tax rates more than the BJP.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting