Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
« News Headlines »
 ICAI to organise two-day international conference in Hyderabad
 Here's how to calculate tax payable on your capital gains
 Income Tax calculations for the financial year 2016-17
 CPE Events 17 October - 22 October 2016
 High Court raps I-T Department for wrong tax demand
  CBDT signs 5 advance pricing pacts with Indian taxpayers
 Finance ministry warns tax officials of action against GST protest
 Big changes for small units under GST
 Parliament’s winter session to begin on November 16 to expedite GST rollout
 Income-tax (27th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - 92/2016
 Announcement - Clarifications in Respect of MEF 2016-17

Tax avoidance and transfer pricing law
November, 03rd 2007
There is no requirement to establish tax evasion before initiation of proceedings for determination of arms length price.

Taxation of multinational corporations (MNCs) is assuming greater and importance because of the opening up of the Indian economy and the entry of large transnationals into the Indian market. The ability of transnational corporations to allocate profits to sister concerns outside the Indian jurisdiction by controlling prices in group transactions has become a matter of great concern.

Profits taxable in India should not be understated by declaring lower receipts or higher outgoings than those which would have been declared by persons entering into similar transactions with unrelated parties in similar circumstances.

Legislative changes were brought about through the Finance Acts 2001 and 2002. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has explained in Circulars 12 and 14 that the basic intention of the new transfer pricing regulation is to prevent shifting out of profits by manipulating prices charged or paid in international transactions, thereby eroding the countrys tax base.

Section 92 of the Income-Tax Act 1961 lays down the Rule for computation of the arms length price in respect of international transactions between associated enterprises. Elaborate machinery is prescribed under Section 92CA for determining the correct price. In fact, Chapter X lays down special provisions relating to tax avoidance. The Memorandum of the Finance Bill 2001 stated that Chapter X was introduced as a measure to curb tax avoidance.

Transfer pricing officers (TPOs) have come on the field and are functioning in major cities. The assessing officer (AO) can refer a case to the TPO after forming an opinion that it is expedient to do so. The TPO will examine the arms length price (ALP) and recommend to the AO the modus operandi for fixing the ALP. The approval of the Commissioner of Income-Tax (CIT) is required for this purpose.

Landmark ruling

In a landmark ruling on transfer pricing regulations and the fixation of ALP, a Full Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), in the Aztec Software and Technology Services Ltd vs ACIT (294 ITR AT 32 Bangalore, SB) case, considered the question whether it is a legal requirement under Chapter X of the I-T Act that the AO should prima facie demonstrate that there is tax avoidance before resorting to Section 92CA.

The Special Bench of five Members held that courts are not required to look into the object or intention of the legislature by resorting to aids to interpretation when the language of the provision is clear and unambiguous.

It is for the AO to form an opinion that circumstances exist making it necessary to refer the matter to the TPO.

The question of tax avoidance is not to be established by following mandatory provisions. It is not necessary for the AO to demonstrate the avoidance of tax before invoking these provisions. Observed the Special Bench: We are not required to find the intent of the legislature by referring to the Budget Speech of the Finance Minister, Notes on Clauses, Circulars etc., when the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous. Headings or Marginal Notes do not control a provision where plain and unambiguous language has been used by the legislature.

According to the Special Bench, there is no such requirement of establishing tax evasion before initiation of proceedings for determination of ALP.

Section 40A provides for disallowance of excessive or unreasonable expenditure in matters concerning transactions between sister units.

The Special Bench ruled that Chapter X is not governed by Section 40A. It also held that the availability of exemption under Section 10A will not bar the applicability of Sections 92C and 92CA of the Act. It is for the assessee to substantiate the most appropriate method by proper documentation. The burden of proof about the correctness of the price charged to associate enterprises is on the assessee.

Important consequences

This ruling of the Special Bench of the Appellate Tribunal will have far-reaching consequences in the application and interpretation of the transfer pricing law. At one sweep, the Special Bench has brushed aside the Finance Minsters speech, Notes on Clauses and the Memorandum explaining the provisions of the law as not relevant in deciding the question whether attempt at tax evasion or avoidance should be proved before invoking Chapter X.

Even the exemption provision for newly established undertakings in free trade zones will have to be disregarded when it comes to a question of applying the TP law.

Naturally, the Special Bench has ruffled the feathers of tax jurists and the ruling is now the subject matter of intense controversy.

T. C. A. Ramanujam
(The author is a former Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax.)
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Outsourcing Company Offshore Software Outsourcing Software Outsourcing Company India Offshore Outsourcing Company India Software BPO Software Business Process Outsourcing Software Outsourcing India Offsho

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions