Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
« News Headlines »
 India is moving towards a flawed GST
 ICAI to organise two-day international conference in Hyderabad
 Here's how to calculate tax payable on your capital gains
 Income Tax calculations for the financial year 2016-17
 CPE Events 17 October - 22 October 2016
 High Court raps I-T Department for wrong tax demand
  CBDT signs 5 advance pricing pacts with Indian taxpayers
 Finance ministry warns tax officials of action against GST protest
 Big changes for small units under GST
 Parliament’s winter session to begin on November 16 to expedite GST rollout
 Income-tax (27th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - 92/2016

ITAT does a reality check on computation of transfer price
November, 12th 2007
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has ruled that the income tax department merely on the basis of inferences and presumptions should not arbitrarily reject the taxpayers transfer pricing calculations and analysis. The ITAT observed that transfer pricing is not a science in which mathematical precision is possible. There should be room for some degree of approximation. Trade and industry should be happy with this ruling of ITAT. Being the first on the subject, the ruling will have a bearing on transfer pricing assessments in the country.
Well, if the mechanism of transfer pricing is not misused or abused by business, then it helps the business concerned to reduce taxes by moving money across borders. In other words, is a tax planning tool for the business concerned. On the other hand, if the said mechanism is misused or abused by business, it leads to tax evasion on the part of the business concerned. This explains why tax authorities take a rather critical look at the transfer pricing calculations of the tax-paying assessees. While doing so, they err on the side of caution at times since they want to save their own skin. But they do so at a great cost to the assessee. 
Obviously, transfer prices are attributable to cross-border business. In cross-border business, transfer of goods and services between the parent company and foreign subsidiaries and between foreign subsidiaries themselves, is quite common. This is because the value creation activities of the business are generally conducted at the various cost-effective locations across the globe. The price of the said goods and services which are transferred between entities within the business is called transfer price. Businesses move funds out of a country by specifying high transfer prices for goods and services supplied to a subsidiary in that country and by specifying low transfer prices for the goods and services provided by that subsidiary. On the other hand, if businesses want to retain the funds in a country, they do the opposite: specifying low transfer prices for goods and services supplied to a subsidiary in that country and specifying high transfer prices for the goods and services provided by that subsidiary. 
Why would businesses want to move funds out of a country or retain funds in a country? The answer is to be found in the differing tax regimes that obtain across the world. The business in question can shift earnings from a high-tax country to a low-tax country, courtesy transfer prices. The business can also use transfer prices to reduce the import duties payable if an ad valorem tariff (tariff computed as a percentage of value) regime is in force. A lower transfer price attracts a lower tariff. There are a couple of other equally important reasons too but anyway we do not need to necessarily consider these reasons for the present discussion. 
Governments generally believe that transfer prices are used by businesses to understate their profits and thus minimise tax payment. But on this pretext the government should not view computation of transfer prices rather cynically. The correct transfer price is the arms-length price. As long as the transfer price computed by the assessee is more or less equal to this arms-length price, the tax authorities should have no reason to complain. As I said earlier, when in doubt, the tax authorities err on the side of caution which means the assessee ends up paying enormous tax. It is not easy for the business or for that matter the tax department itself to compute the arms-length price accurately. Some margin has to be allowed to the assessee in question. As the ITAT has rightly said, transfer pricing is not a science in which mathematical precision is possible. Thus, the taxpayers transfer pricing calculations and analysis should not be arbitrarily rejected by the income tax department merely on the basis of inferences and presumptions. 
The ITAT held that the transfer pricing officer should carry out a fresh research into the issue only if there is a valid ground to presume that the companys approach to the issue of transfer pricing is insufficient. For example, the department can re-look into the issue if it feels that the factors taken into account for comparing the pricing with the pricing of other companies profitability, risk factor are not correct. If the FAR (functions, asset and risk) analysis made by the company is correct, there is no need for the transfer pricing officer to initiate a fresh research into their issue. 
The ITAT has also observed that companies that take higher risk are bound to make higher profits or higher losses. Hence a sound risk analysis is necessary while selecting the comparables for determining the profitability of a transaction. Now the question is whether our income tax department has the expertise to undertake the said sound risk analysis to select the comparables. I do not think it has; it can hire experts to access their service, though. In such a case, the benefit-cost analysis should favour such hiring!
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Organic SEO Outsourcing Organic Search Engine Optimization Outsourcing Organic Website SEO Organic SEO India Website SEO India Organic Search Engine Optimization India Organic Internet SEO India Organic Web

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions