Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
 
From the Courts »
 BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-2
 Paradigm Geophysical Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, New Delhi
 M/s Televista Electronics Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Vs. Mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt. Ltd
  SRD Nutrients Private Limited vs. CCE (Supreme Court)
 Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd. (Formerly Known As(M/s Samvardhana Motherson Finance Ltd.)a Vs. Assitant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 22(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. M/s Frontline Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
 Ram Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-64(2) & Anr.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 Vs. St Microelectronics Private Ltd.
  The Chamber Of Tax Consultants vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
 M/s Ess Distribution (Mauritius) S.N.C.Et Compagnie Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -1(2)(2) International Taxation, New Delhi

No Penalty when no clandestine removal of goods: SC
November, 22nd 2006
A recent ruling of Supreme Court has come as a mega relief for manufacturers who were slapped with Penalty by Excise Authorities in cases which did not fall in the category of clandestine removal.  

Setting aside the Penalty of One Crore imposed on manufacturer ; the Apex Court has ruled that when there is not even an allegation much less finding by the department that there has been any clandestine removal of goods without assessment- the penalty is liable to be set aside.

 The proposed penalty was under Rule 9(2) and 52-A of Central Excise Rules.   

SC referred to the ruling in case of N.B. Sanjana Vs. Elphinstone Spg. & Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd., wherein it was held as under:

".....To attract sub-rule (2) of Rule 9, the goods should have been removed in contravention of sub-rule (1).  It is not the case of the appellants that the respondents have not complied with the provisions of sub-rule (1). We are of the opinion that in order to attract sub-rule (2), the goods should have been removed clandestinely and without assessment.  In this case there is no such clandestine removal without assessment.  On the other hand, goods had been removed with the express permission of the Excise authorities and after order of assessment was made.  No doubt the duty payable under the assessment order was nil.  That, in our opinion, will not bring the case under sub-rule (2). " SC observed that in the present case there is not even an allegation much less finding by the department that there has been any clandestine removal of goods without assessment.  As such the penalty is liable to be set aside.   The matter having been settled in the Kar Vivad Samadan Scheme, 1998 the question of determination of the duty payable or levy of penalty did not arise.  In our view, the Tribunal clearly erred in upholding the levy of penalty.  

The Appeal filed by the assessee was accepted and the penalty levied was ordered to be deleted.

Revenue also filed Appeal against the deletion of duty demand of Rs. 17,67,13,315/- raised in the show-cause notice . Dismissing the Appeal of Revenue; SC ruled that after the grant of certificate under the Kar Vivad Samadan Scheme, 1998 as having settled the dispute and payment of the amount determined no further proceedings could be initiated or proceeded with for the period in question.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System developers CMS developers Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions CMS India Content Management System India CMS development India Website CMS Website Content Management India Portal CMS India CMS Outsourcing CMS Vendor Complete CMS Custom CMS Services

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions