Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS
 
 
ę News Headlines »
 Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Securities excluded from GST ambit in revised Bill
 GST dilemma: Hope fades for new tax regime
 5nance.com launches tax investment platform
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful

No need for TDS remittance until earners identity is clear
November, 29th 2006

You have no liability to pay TDS until you know the identity of the person who receives the income. This is the upshot of a Mumbai Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruling.

The ITAT, the second appellate body on tax matters, gave this order on an appeal filed by the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) which faced an interest and penalty of over Rs 4 crore on charges of defaulting on TDS remittance. IDBI did not remit TDS on interest payable to its Regular Return Bond holders, even though it had claimed deduction on account of the same. The department did not accept IDBIs reason for not remitting TDS.

IDBI took the stand that there was no way of knowing before March 31, the last date for making advance tax payment, the identity of the bondholders who were to be paid interest. The identity of the bondholders could not be known earlier, because IDBI, for the purpose of paying interest, takes into account only bondholders who are registered with IDBI on May 15 of each year.

The ITAT held that IDBI has no liability to deduct tax at source in relation to interest payable to its bondholders since it did not know who were the bondholders until March 31, the last date for paying advance tax each year.

In the relevant accounting year, IDBI made a provision of Rs 55.31 crore for interests accrued and claimed deduction in computation of business income. Though deduction was claimed on account of interest payable to the bondholders, IDBI did not remit the tax payable from such interest payments.

Section 193 of the Income-tax Act and the explanation read with it stipulate that TDS is payable as and when payment is made or credited. Thus, the Income-tax assessing officer held that IDBI was required to deduct the tax at source from the credit to interest payable account; since this was not done, interest and penalty was levied on the bank. The concerned officer made an order levying tax and penalty for three years aggregating to Rs 4.37 crore. The assessment years in this case are 1994-95, 1995-96 and 1996-97.

IDBI counsel Dinesh Vyas argued that liability to tax deduction at source is a vicarious liability and presupposes existence of a principal liability in the hands of a person who is to receive the income. He argued that while IDBIs liability to pay interest is certain and provision has to be made as on March 31 upon the end of the accounting year, the bond being freely transferable, it cannot be ascertained as to who will be the registered bondholder as on May 15 every year. In this situation, IDBI will not know by the end of the fiscal year that who will be entitled to receive the interest.

The tribunal held, It is a sine qua non for vicarious tax deduction liability that there has to be a principal tax liability in respect of the relevant income first, and a principal tax liability can come into existence when it can be ascertained as to who will receive or earn that income. In this view of the matter, tax deduction at source mechanism cannot be put into practice until identity of the person in whose hands it is includible as income can be ascertained.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Portal Design Website Design Portal Designing Website Designing Web Design Professional Portal Design Professional Website Design Professional Web Design Portal Design India Website Design India Portal Designing India Website Designing India Web Design India Professional Portal Design India Professional Website Design India Chicago Professional Web Design New York Professional Web Design California Website Design Florida Website Design New Jersey Website Design Britain UK Website Design London Manchester Website Design

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions