Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Why you need not rush to file your ITR immediately
 Income tax returns: ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing
 Section 80DDB tax benefits for specified illnesses: 5 things to know
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Five tips to help taxpayers decide between old and new income tax regimes
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) available now on e-filing income tax portal

Decision on taxability of BPO units likely to be made soon
November, 16th 2006

The issue of taxation of business process outsourcing (BPO) units in the country may be resolved soon. The appeals by both the income tax (I-T) department and Morgan Stanley have been listed for hearing in the Supreme Court (SC) on Friday.

The issue assumes significance for BPO outfits of multinational companies in the country. Any decision either way will settle the question of taxability of the BPO outfits. The verdict in this case will have large ramifications for the fast growing services sector, in which India has a leadership position globally. For any MNC, that sets up an offshore unit, a presence in India has become almost mandatory.

The appeal to the SC arose after the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) said that the outsourcing carried by Morgans Indian subsidiary did not constitute a permanent establishment. This ruling meant that the company would not have to pay corporate tax in India on a portion of its profit, provided that the BPO and the overseas parent did not violate fair pricing norms or arms length pricing.

The income tax departments special leave petition contests the ruling given by the AAR on - Morgan Stanley Advantage Services (MSAS), a captive BPO in India - which provides support services to IT and research.

On its part, Morgan Stanley also filed a cross appeal in the SC against the ruling. The court has issued notices to both the parties in the case.

The AAR, is a quasi-judicial body, set up to give opinion to guide companies on their potential tax liabilities. The relief for Morgan Stanley meant that other BPOs could quote the same judgement.

Specifically, the court will decide whether the appeals of both the parties are admissible or not. If any of the appeals of any of the parties or both the parties is admitted, the court would also fix a date for hearing.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting