Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income Tax Return Filing: 10 Mistakes To Avoid When Filing ITR For AY 2024-25
 Old vs New Tax Regime: Who should move to the New Tax Regime from the old one?
 Income Tax Calculator FY 2023-24: How To Know Your Tax Liability Online On IT Dept's Portal?
 BackBack Income Tax Act amendment on cards on tax treatment of MSME dues
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing. Check details here
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Experts share these 8 benefits for taxpayers in new income tax regime
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80

`Advocates can correspond with sales tax authority'
November, 08th 2006

An advocate enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1962 is entitled to appear before any authority, other than the Special Tribunal, under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act,1959, the Madras High Court has held.

This decision was delivered upon a writ petition by a trader challenging a communication dated October 10, 2005 by Commercial Tax Officer, Perundurai.

The communication said that a legal practitioner, who was authorised to appear before the sales tax authority as provided for under the TN General Sales Tax Act, could not correspond on behalf of the dealers, but could only appear before such an authority.

Mr Justice K. Chandru said that as an attorney the advocate could be authorised to do certain acts on behalf of the client, unless the statute specifically prohibited such a conduct by the advocate.

Section 52 of the Act, in fact provided for, in a wider context, where a relative or a full-time employee or an accountant of the dealer could even be authorised to represent his case before tax officers. It was not as if only advocates were given monopoly to appear.

When the intention of the Act was too wide, it was not proper for the respondent (Commercial Tax Officer, Perundurai, Erode Dist) to write to the dealer that he could not send proceedings through his lawyer.

In the absence of any prohibition under Sales Tax Act or Rules, it was open to the dealer to make his representation through his attorney by properly authorising the said attorney.

The petitioner, S.K. Trading Company, Uthukulli Road, Kunnathur, pleaded for quashing the communication of the CTO.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting