sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
News Headlines »
 Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2019
  Tax saving guide for FY 2018-19
 4 lesser known ways to save tax. Filing income tax returns?
 You do not have to pay TDS on FDs under this amount Income tax returns (ITR)
 Income-tax (15th Amendment) Rules, 2019
 How To Calculate Income Tax For Assessment Year 2020-21
 Financial Interim Budget 2019-20
 5 personal tax changes expected in Budget 2019
 Check how much tax would be levied on your income Income Tax returns Invested in debt schemes
 3 taxes no one should have to pay
  Tax saving guide for FY 2018-19

How to get income tax return exemption What you must do to really benefit from gift
October, 03rd 2018

A taxpayer's return was selected for scrutiny by the tax officer for investigating the increase in his capital account, as declared in the return of income. During the course of assessment, the tax officer observed that the taxpayer had categorised an amount of Rs 8 lakh as gift received from a relative.

A taxpayer's return was selected for scrutiny by the tax officer for investigating the increase in his capital account, as declared in the return of income. During the course of assessment, the tax officer observed that the taxpayer had categorised an amount of Rs 8 lakh as gift received from a relative. When the relevant documents for the same were produced, the tax officer observed that the amount was in fact received from another individual (hereafter referred to as the debtor). The taxpayer submitted that the said amount was actually a gift of Rs 8 lakh from his aunt, who was based out of UAE. On her directions, the debtor who was liable to return some debt due to the aunt, paid out the money directly to the taxpayer in his bank account. The taxpayer further argued that his aunt being a relative, as defined under the Income Tax Act ('the Act'), the sum of Rs 8 lakh received from her would be exempt from tax.

To support his claim, the taxpayer produced a certificate from the respective bank regarding the transfer of amount from the account of the debtor to his account. The tax officer, to check the genuineness of the transaction, wrote a letter to the debtor at his address, which was returned. The taxpayer was further asked to show how the relation of the aunt is covered within the definition of family as given under the Act.

The tax officer was not convinced with the genuineness, creditworthiness and identity of the gift giver as a near relative and accordingly added the gift amount to his taxable income as unexplained cash credit.

At the first appellate level, the taxpayer reiterated before the authority that the amount was a gift received from his aunt. The tax officer argued that the connection betwen the aunt and the debtor from whose account the amount was transferred, could not be proved. It was the taxpayer's responsibility to prove the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the aunt and the debtor. Since it was not done the appellate authority, too, confirmed the addition of the amount to the taxpayer's income.

Before the tax tribunal, the taxpayer argued that having submitted the bank certificate, the obligation to prove the genuineness of the gift through the banking channel and creditworthiness of the payer stands duly discharged. The taxpayer further submitted that under the relevant provisions of the Act, once the existence of the person in whose name, the credits are found in the books of the taxpayer is proved, the source of the source is not required to be proved. The taxpayer had submitted the confirmation from the aunt for having paid the money, as well as the confirmation from the bank regarding remittance of the said amount.

The tax officer contended that the genuineness could not be claimed to be proved, when the money was received not directly from the Aunt, but the debtor, who in turn is not connected or related to the taxpayer.

The tribunal observed that the taxpayer had not furnished a single evidence or document to show how this amount has been actually received from his aunt and not the debtor. In the absence of any documentary evidence for movement of amount between the Aunt and the debtor, the taxpayer has failed to establish the claim of gift from his Aunt. Consequently, the tribunal confirmed that addition of Rs 8 lakh to the taxpayer's income for the said year.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions